Delhi High Court penalises a serial litigant for filing multiple pleas against illegal constructions in the national capital. The Court emphasised, “No one should misuse the court’s process for oblique motives,” warning against frivolous petitions that burden the judicial system.
The Delhi High Court has directed the Election Commission of India to examine a petition by Akhil Bharatiya Jan Sangh seeking a common election symbol for the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections. The party said the “non-allotment of an election symbol will take away its opportunity to contest elections.”
![[IndiGo Vs Mahindra] Mahindra Restrain Not To Use '6E' Mark Till Disposal Of IndiGo Suit: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-13.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
IndiGo is asserting its “6E” trademark rights against Mahindra Electric, which agreed to rename its upcoming electric vehicle from “BE 6E” to “BE 6” amid the legal dispute. Mahindra plans to contest the lawsuit while the court has scheduled a hearing for April 2025, highlighting the significance of trademark usage over mere registration.
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday (3rd Dec) issued a temporary injunction against Scholars Den for labeling Physics Wallah as “sasta wallah” (cheap one), claiming it misrepresents the company’s affordable yet quality courses. The court determined that Scholors Den’s ads could cause irreparable harm to Physics Wallah’s reputation before the next hearing in April 2025.
![['MOTI MAHAL' Trademark Infringement Case] Delhi HC Temporarily Restrains From Using Unauthorized 'Moti Mahal' Trademark](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Butter-Chicken-Origin-_-Daryaganj-Challenges-Moti-Mahals-Defamatory-Remarks-in-Delhi-HC.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Justice Mini Pushkarna of the Delhi High Court granted interim relief to Rupa Gujral, restraining defendants from using the ‘MOTI MAHAL’ trademark amid ongoing arbitration related to a partnership deed. The court determined the defendants falsely claimed association with the brand. The plaintiffs assert their exclusive rights to the trademark and associated goodwill.
