The Delhi High Court granted Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and other respondents three weeks to respond to the Enforcement Directorate’s plea challenging a trial court’s refusal to take cognisance of its chargesheet in the National Herald money laundering case.
Today, On 25th May, In the excise policy case row, the Delhi High Court adjourned the Central Bureau of Investigation plea against the discharge of Arvind Kejriwal to July 16, with Justice Manoj Jain confirming the next hearing date for all parties.
The Delhi High Court transferred the excise policy case involving Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and other AAP leaders to Justice Manoj Jain after Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma directed reassignment following initiation of contempt proceedings.
The Delhi High Court has ruled that ending a romantic relationship cannot be treated as instigation to commit suicide. The Court clarified that a breakup alone does not fulfil the legal requirements to constitute the offense of abetment of suicide.
Suspended senior civil judge moved the Delhi High Court seeking quashing of an ED money laundering case. Listed on January 20, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani recused, and the matter was later placed before Justice Manoj Jain for consideration later.
Today, On 3rd September, Lawyer Jai Dehadrai has approached the Delhi High Court challenging a gag order in the ongoing dispute with MP Mahua Moitra over their rottweiler, Henry, arguing the public has the right to know.
The Supreme Court has upheld a tribunal’s discretion to condone Doosan Power’s 84-day delay in filing its defence, ruling that arbitral rules “are meant to guide and not bind.” The Court rejected Aneja Constructions’ plea, affirming party autonomy remains subject to fairness and justice.
Today, On 13th May, The High Court scheduled a July 22 hearing to review the challenge against Sajjan Kumar’s acquittal in the 1984 riots case. The court addressed the CBI and a witness, seeking trial court records. The acquittal granted Kumar the “benefit of doubt,” while two others were also acquitted. The case has drawn significant attention, and the upcoming session is anticipated to feature detailed arguments from both sides.
The Delhi High Court ruled that possessing photos of Laden and ISIS flags doesn’t automatically indicate membership in a terrorist organization. Digital accessibility and curiosity were highlighted, stressing the need for substantial evidence for terrorism links. The court’s remarks were provisional, emphasizing the bail issue and not conclusive opinions on the case’s merits.
Today, 22nd April, The Delhi High Court set May 15 for hearing Arvind Kejriwal’s challenge to ED summonses related to a money laundering case. Kejriwal’s plea questions the legality of ED’s actions, marking a crucial legal battle. The court granted him time to respond to ED’s reply. Kejriwal argues against PMLA provisions and accuses unfair use for political motivation.
