NEW DELHI: Today (28th Jan): The Supreme Court of India has acquitted Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap, a man who was on death row since 2015 for the rape and murder of a 23-year-old techie, Esther Anuhya, in 2014.
The Supreme Court ruled that a woman involved in an extra-marital affair cannot be charged under Section 498A IPC for cruelty, as she does not qualify as a “relative.” The bench, led by Justices Gavai and Viswanathan, quashed a criminal case against a woman based on allegations from the complainant-wife.
![[Row Over OBC List] "Reservation Cannot Be On The Basis Of Religion": Apex Court During the Hearing Of West Bengal Plea Against HC Judgement Quashing OBC Classification Of 77 Communities](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-14.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court On December 9 addressed West Bengal’s petition against the Calcutta High Court’s annulment of OBC classification for 77 communities, mainly Muslim. Justice Gavai emphasized reservations cannot be religion-based. While Sibal defended the classification as socially rooted, Patwalia critiqued its implementation. The Court scheduled further hearings for January 2025.
The Supreme Court today issued a warning to the Maharashtra Government, threatening to halt welfare schemes if compensation is not paid to landowners. The court criticized the state’s budgetary allocation for schemes, demanding compensation for illegally taken land. The Chief Secretary may be summoned if steps are not taken by August 28. The court also considered a plea for regulation of political party election manifestos.
The Supreme Court of India emphasized caution in relying solely on AI for translating legal documents, highlighting potential errors. Despite challenges, AI has been integral in enhancing access to justice, with initiatives like AI-driven transcription and translations. The upcoming Supreme Court Hackathon underlines the judiciary’s commitment to leveraging technology for improved judicial processes.
Today(on 8th July),The Supreme Court, led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, dismissed West Bengal’s Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court directive for a CBI investigation into allegations in Sandeshkhali. Despite the State’s request for a deferral, the Court upheld the broader scope of the investigation, encompassing multiple FIRs including those related to the Ration Scam.
Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant stressed the necessity of safeguarding free speech, especially for journalists and the media. He emphasized the crucial link between freedom of speech and leading a dignified life, and the courts’ disapproval of attempts to curtail this right. The event also featured discussions on protecting the media’s rights within constitutional limits.
The Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a plea on Monday (4th March) for a Minimum Support Price (MSP) for farmers, citing it as a policy decision for the government. The plea aimed to secure fair income for farmers and ensure dignified treatment, amidst ongoing protests. The Court emphasized the separation of powers and advised thorough research before filing petitions. The ongoing farmer protests have resulted in clashes with the police, leading to legal actions and demands for criminal investigations. The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India laid down guidelines emphasizing reasonable and proportionate restrictions on the internet, the importance of Freedom of Press, and the need for a legal framework governing internet shutdowns.
Supreme Court Upholds Registrar’s Decision on Special Leave Petition Against Administrative HC Order In a recent development, the Supreme Court has made a significant observation regarding the scope of special leave petitions (SLPs). The apex court noted that an SLP challenging an order passed by the High Court on the administrative side is not permissible. […]
