CJI B.R. Gavai retires after delivering 464 judgements and serving on 772 benches during a standout 6.5-year tenure. His authorship rate never fell below 50%, marking him as one of the Supreme Court’s most consistent judges.
The Supreme Court has raised serious questions over key clauses of the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, highlighting excessive state involvement and stringent procedures that burden individuals seeking to adopt a new faith.
The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of STT. The petitioner argues STT causes double taxation and penalizes traders even when in loss.
Former Supreme Court Justice Abhay S. Oka, in his first interview after retirement, criticised the transfer of the stray dog case from Justice Pardiwala’s bench, stressing that even the Chief Justice has no authority to ask any bench to modify its order.
The Supreme Court set aside an Allahabad High Court order refusing to suspend a convict’s sentence, stating, “Such errors arise in the High Court when settled law is not applied properly,” days after criticising another HC judge in a civil dispute case.
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court reinforced the legal sanctity of limitation statutes, emphasizing that delay in initiating legal proceedings—especially when parties are aware of the original transaction—cannot be condoned lightly.
Justice J.B. Pardiwala, born on August 12, 1965, became a Supreme Court Judge on May 9, 2022, after a distinguished legal career starting in 1989. He has authored 82 judgements, notably upholding EWS reservations and allowing states to tax mines. His tenure lasts until August 11, 2030.
Yesterday, On 16th July, The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, issued a notice to the Defence Ministry in response to Nagaland’s plea to prosecute 30 Army personnel involved in the Mon killings. This comes after the Central government denied prosecution sanction under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. The incident, which sparked public outcry, occurred during a flawed military operation in December 2021.
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to 70-year-old visually impaired Bherulal, criticizing the Madhya Pradesh High Court for a “casual approach.” Bherulal was convicted of various offenses and sentenced to four years in prison. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for proper legal principles and criticized the High Court for lacking reasoning in denying the suspension of the sentence.
More than 400 Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) are seeking post-retirement benefits, alleging discrimination and citing violations of their constitutional rights. They argue that they are denied benefits under various pension schemes and are left without financial support post-retirement. The case, acknowledged by the Supreme Court, could have significant implications for similar cases in various sectors.
