The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL by NGO Infrastructure Watchdog seeking a probe into Punjab National Bank and Bank of Maharashtra’s One-Time Settlement with Asian Hotels North, calling it speculative and unsupported by facts.
![[Demolition Row] Delhi HC asks Authorities to Grant 1 month for Vacating Mosque Premises](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.png?resize=447%2C300&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court ruled that government-aided minority educational institutions have full autonomy in appointing employees, exempt from the Delhi School Education Rules. This decision came in response to a plea by the Delhi Tamil Education Association, emphasizing the right to establish and manage the institutions, including the appointment of staff, without state interference.
![[NTA vs. NEET Candidate] High Court Requests NTA's Response to NEET Candidate's Complaint about Torn OMR Sheet](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-73.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court asked the NTA to respond to a petition by a NEET candidate, who received a torn OMR sheet during the exam, seeking grace marks. The petitioner’s plea highlights unfair disadvantage and seeks equitable treatment. The court’s intervention aims to prompt transparent and prompt resolution, potentially setting a precedent for similar cases.
The Delhi High Court Today (March 13th) appointed Senior Advocate Gaurav Pachnanda as amicus curiae to help resolve a complex jurisdictional question under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The 5-judge Bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, is addressing the issue of filing cancellation petitions and has enlisted Pachnanda’s expertise. The case is scheduled for further examination in May 2024.
The Delhi High Court has mandated both parents’ names on educational certificates to promote gender equality, emphasizing equal recognition in academic achievements. Justice C Hari Shankar dismisses archaic gender notions and highlights the significant progress women have made in law. The decision is backed by a 2014 circular from the University Grants Commission.
The Delhi High Court has reinforced the binding nature of the computerized draw of lots conducted by the Directorate of Education (DoE) for the admission of students under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. Justice C Hari Shankar ruled that schools must adhere to the outcomes of these draws, which are based on the class […]
The Delhi High Court has strongly cautioned against the politicization of educational institutions, stressing that campuses must not be utilized as arenas for promoting partisan agendas. This admonition arose during the proceedings of Swati Singh v JNU, where Justice C Hari Shankar underscored the importance of upholding discipline among students and ensuring that educational establishments […]
The Delhi High Court rejected Lotus Herbal’s plea to prevent Deepika Padukone’s company from using the name ‘Lotus Splash’ for their facewash. The court emphasized the differences between the products’ appearance, pricing, and branding. It also highlighted the symbolic meaning of “Lotus Splash” and the absence of trademark infringement. This case has implications for trademark law and the use of common words in brand names.