Today, On 25th September, Delhi High Court orally stated that it will direct the removal of memes and videos targeting BJP leader and Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia. The Court stated, “We will order take down of defamatory videos” if defendants fail to comply.
The Delhi High Court has mandated Baba Ramdev to submit a written promise not to make offensive comments about competitors, particularly Hamdard. This follows his derogatory remarks in a promotional video for Patanjali’s Gulab Sharbat. Ramdev’s actions prompted strong criticism from the Court, which seeks assurance of compliance by May 9.
Baba Ramdev faced criticism for using communal language against Hamdard’s Rooh Afza, claiming funds were used for religious buildings. After a Delhi High Court reprimand, he agreed to remove the videos and avoid future disparaging remarks, ensuring compliance while a police complaint regarding religious hatred remains pending. The case proceeds on May 1.
OpenAI has claimed immunity from copyright infringement in India regarding allegations from ANI, asserting that its LLM training and data storage occur outside the country, thus falling outside Indian copyright law. OpenAI’s attorney argued there’s no direct use of ANI’s content and that no evidence of copyright violation has been presented.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Monday, 17th Feb, directed OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, to submit a response regarding an application filed by the Indian Music Industry (IMI). IMI wants to join a copyright lawsuit filed by news agency Asian News International (ANI) against OpenAI. ANI has accused OpenAI of using its content without permission to train and run ChatGPT.
![[IndiGo Vs Mahindra] Mahindra Restrain Not To Use '6E' Mark Till Disposal Of IndiGo Suit: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-13.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
IndiGo is asserting its “6E” trademark rights against Mahindra Electric, which agreed to rename its upcoming electric vehicle from “BE 6E” to “BE 6” amid the legal dispute. Mahindra plans to contest the lawsuit while the court has scheduled a hearing for April 2025, highlighting the significance of trademark usage over mere registration.
