The Supreme Court criticized the Residents’ Welfare Association for occupying the historic Gumti of Shaikh Ali tomb and rebuked the Archaeological Survey of India for failing to protect it. The court plans to appoint an archaeological expert to assess damages and emphasized the need to safeguard heritage sites for future generations.
![[Bizarre Request]“My Mind is Being Controlled by A Machine,” Claims By The Petitioner: SC Rejects Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-1-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court dismissed a bizarre plea from a teacher claiming his brain was controlled by a machine. Justices Dhulia and Amanullah found no merit in the petition, as the Andhra Pradesh High Court had previously rejected similar allegations regarding a ‘human brain reading machine’ from a forensic laboratory.
On Tuesday(16th July),The Supreme Court rebuked its registry for directing a case involving a service dispute and individuals with criminal histories to the Lok Adalat. The case involved an appeal challenging the rejection of a constable position due to nondisclosure of criminal prosecution, upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in August 2019.
The Supreme Court directed all states to complete migrant laborer verification for ration cards within four weeks, warning of consequences for non-compliance. Only Bihar and Telangana completed 100% verification. The court also criticized delays in distributing rations and instructed the Centre to release food grains to compliant states. Previously, the court instructed ration card issuance within two months for registered laborers.
The Supreme Court of India addressed the inhumane conditions in Indian prisons, urging states and union territories to take comprehensive measures to improve inmate well-being. The Court emphasized the protection of prisoners’ fundamental rights and directed officials to submit detailed affidavits addressing capacity, logistics, and enhancement efforts. The apex court set a deadline for these submissions and called for urgent action.
The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with NCDRC members’ defiance of an interim order, raising concerns about their adherence to legal procedures. The case originated from consumer grievances filed by homebuyers affected by delays in a housing project. The Court scheduled further proceedings and considered representations from both the project developer and legal heirs of a deceased homebuyer.
Today, On 23rd April, The Supreme Court expressed grave concern over overcrowded and dire prison conditions, urging urgent reform. Chief secretaries were directed to provide a schedule for implementation, particularly in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Chhattisgarh. The report emphasized the harsh situation for women prisoners and the need for addressing overcrowding in prisons across several states.
New delhi: The recent statement “We will rip you apart” by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah sparked a debate about judicial decorum. Judges expressed concern over the appropriateness of such language for a high judicial position, citing the need for impartial discussions and maintaining sobriety in court proceedings. Past rulings emphasize the high standards of behavior expected from judges.
Today, 10th April, The Supreme Court
scolded Uttarakhand’s drug licensing authority for failing to act against Patanjali Ayurved’s misleading ads, suspending three officers. The court also criticized Patanjali’s founders and the central AYUSH Ministry for not intervening. This follows a petition by the Indian Medical Association over misleading claims against COVID-19 and vaccines.