“Judicial Activism Has Limits”: CJI Gavai Warns Against Judicial Adventurism or Judicial Terrorism

CJI B. R. Gavai cautioned that while courts must protect citizens’ rights, “judicial activism should not turn into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism.” He made the remark at a book launch in Delhi, stressing the need for balanced judicial intervention.

Supreme Court Defers Hearing on Criminal Contempt Plea Against WB CM Mamata Banerjee: “Don’t Try to Politicize Your Political Battle Before the Court”

Today, On 21st July, The Supreme Court deferred the criminal contempt plea against WB CM Mamata Banerjee, warning, “Don’t try to politicize your political battle before the Court.” The bench made it clear the courtroom is not a political platform.

Criminal Contempt Case Against Mamata Banerjee Listed Before CJI Gavai’s Bench

Supreme Court to hear criminal contempt plea against West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee tomorrow. Matter listed as Item No. 3 before Chief Justice B.R. Gavai’s bench.

Senior Government Official: “Respect for Judiciary is Paramount”

Top government sources emphasized that “respect for judiciary is paramount” amid the ongoing controversy. This statement was made in response to recent tensions between the judiciary and government institutions, highlighting the importance of maintaining the judiciary’s integrity and its vital role in India’s democratic system.

“Unwarranted & Extraneous”: CJI Sets Aside HC’s Condition That YouTuber Must Shut Down YouTube Channel For Bail

The Supreme Court confirmed Felix Jerald’s bail and criticized the Madras High Court’s condition mandating the closure of his YouTube channel, stating it was “unwarranted and extraneous.” The ruling emphasized that while the closure requirement is lifted, other bail conditions remain in place following Jerald’s arrest linked to a controversial interview.

Delhi High Court Discharges Engineer for Judiciary Remarks After Accepting Apology

The Delhi High Court recently accepted the apology of an engineer, Brijesh Shukla, who had made derogatory remarks against the judiciary. The division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Shalinder Kaur considered the context of Shukla’s actions, acknowledging that his allegations against a judicial officer and the judiciary were likely a result of […]