The Supreme Court has directed all High Court Chief Justices to review long-pending cases under laws like UAPA and ensure speedy trials. The court said the State must support accused facing “reverse burden” laws and prevent unnecessary delays.
A new survey by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) shows that 38.5% of women lawyers find the legal profession discouraging, revealing serious challenges linked to gender bias, limited leadership opportunities, and the pressures of marriage and motherhood affecting careers.
Today, On 26th November, Chief Justice of Bhutan said India’s Constitution has undergone 106 amendments, yet its basic structure remains intact. He praised the Indian judiciary for its stability, judicial excellence, and significant contribution to upholding rule of law across common law nations.
Today, On 21st November, The Supreme Court held a ceremonial bench to bid farewell to CJI BR Gavai, as Bar members and law officers praised his simplicity and warmth. Attorney General Venkataramani said, “We deeply value the grace and dignity you brought.”
CJI BR Gavai said Dr. B.R. Ambedkar never considered the Constitution a permanent document and believed it should evolve with time. He emphasised that citizens can always approach courts when their fundamental rights are violated.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI B.R. Gavai, closed the contempt case against a lawyer and litigant who made scandalous allegations against Telangana High Court Judge Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, after their apology was accepted. The bench reminded that “Majesty of law lies in forgiving,” while cautioning lawyers against filing petitions with baseless accusations.
Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai said that while nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh faced political instability, India has stayed united due to the strength of its Constitution. He credited the judiciary and constitutional values for keeping the nation stable for 75 years.
Former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S. Oka responded to Sanjeev Sanyal’s remark, saying that criticism of the judiciary is acceptable, but one must show proof that court orders have actually hindered development or violated the Constitution, not make sweeping claims.
Journalist Ajeet Bharti has approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court fearing action by the Punjab Police over his remarks about CJI B.R. Gavai. He said his comments were journalistic opinions on matters of public importance, not criminal in nature.
Justice Aniruddha Bose said the rule of law must keep pace with technology to avoid a “digital apartheid.” He praised India’s digital growth but cautioned against misuse of AI and manipulated digital evidence in judiciary.
