The Supreme Court of India dismissed a judicial officer’s plea challenging his compulsory retirement by the Uttar Pradesh government. The court upheld the Allahabad High Court’s decision that supported a screening committee’s recommendation based on the officer’s service record, deeming him unfit for continued service.
NEW DELHI: 19th May: The Supreme Court of India has clearly said that all retired High Court judges – whether they were permanent judges or additional judges – must receive equal pension and other retirement benefits. This ruling aims to ensure that there is no unfair treatment among retired judges when it comes to pensions and post-retirement benefits.
Justice MG Priyadarsini of the Telangana High Court passed away unexpectedly, leaving the legal community in mourning. She was the 16th most senior judge, expected to retire next year. With a notable legal career starting in 1995, she became a judge in 2022, marking a significant loss for the Telangana judiciary.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that the seniority of Civil Judges should be based on their appointment date rather than selection. This judgment arose from a case regarding Civil Judges in Chhattisgarh, confirming that delays in appointments should not disadvantage candidates, thereby clarifying seniority rules within the judiciary.
Justice Manoj Misra, born on June 2, 1965, graduated from the University of Allahabad in 1988 and began his legal career at the Allahabad High Court. After 23 years in practice, he became an Additional Judge in 2011 and a Permanent Judge in 2013. He was appointed as a Supreme Court Judge on February 6, 2023.
The Chief Justice of India, D Y Chandrachud, highlighted the need for greater gender representation in the legal profession despite progress made. He called upon the legal community to promote equality and ensure inclusivity in judicial institutions for everyone. Women already constitute over 60% of recruits in some states, reflecting social evolution in India.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, Today has converted a letter into a Public Interest Litigation to examine rules in Madhya Pradesh that prevent visually impaired candidates from becoming judicial officers. This proactive step highlights the judiciary’s commitment to addressing inequality and injustice, setting a precedent for a more inclusive legal system.
