The Supreme Court, hearing the All India Judges Association v. Union of India case, questioned if prior Civil Judge experience should count twice in promotions. Justice Joymalya Bagchi warned that such practice could distort equality in the District Judge cadre.
CJI Gavai emphasized that a country cannot genuinely call itself progressive or democratic unless it tackles deep-rooted social inequalities. He highlighted the urgent need to eliminate systemic barriers that continue to marginalize large sections of society.
CJI Bhushan R. Gavai firmly told the Centre, “Don’t act selectively on collegium recommendations,” stressing that judicial appointments must be handled fairly, without splitting or delaying names, to protect the independence and integrity of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court Collegium, under Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, faced obstacles in judicial appointments, with key recommendations for Saurabh Kirpal and R. John Sathyan stalled by the government. Notably, no women were recommended for the Supreme Court. Delays and concerns over government interference have prompted judicial discourse on these appointments.
On Monday(13th May), Supreme Court seeks clarification from Himachal Pradesh High Court Registrar on non-elevation of two senior district judges, following formal grievance. Judges claim rightful promotions unjustly bypassed.
