Heated Arguments Between the Counsel and the Court Do Not Amount to Contempt: Allahabad High Court 

The Allahabad High Court held that incorrect judicial orders or heated courtroom exchanges between lawyers and judges do not constitute criminal contempt, observing that such incidents neither scandalise the court nor obstruct justice, while dismissing advocate Arun Mishra’s contempt petition.

Obstruct the Administration of Justice: Gujarat High Court Recommends Contempt Case Against District Judge Over Remarks on HC Judge

The Gujarat High Court recommended criminal contempt proceedings against suspended Additional District Judge GR Soni, observing that his allegations against a senior judge amounted to interference with judicial proceedings and obstruction of justice, thereby constituting “criminal contempt”.

Matrimonial Battle of Mahabharata: Supreme Court Slams Lawyer-Husband, Orders Rs.5 Crore Alimony and Quashes 80 Cases

Supreme Court ended a decade-long dispute it called a “matrimonial battle of Mahabharata”, quashing 80 cases and ordering Rs.5 crore alimony after noting the lawyer-husband misused legal expertise to hinder his wife’s maintenance and custody proceedings for years.

Lowered Court’s And Tried To Interfere With Judicial Proceedings: Delhi High Court Frames Criminal Contempt Charges Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court framed criminal contempt charges against a Delhi advocate for scandalous allegations in court and a similar LinkedIn post. The court said he lowered its authority and interfered with judicial proceedings by uploading the post.

Nobody Dares To Do This: CJI Surya Kant Slams Petitioner for Calling His Brother and Questioning Court’s Order

Supreme Court of India criticised a litigant after Surya Kant revealed in open court that the litigant’s father phoned his brother to question a judicial order. CJI Surya Kant remarked Stating, “Nobody dares to do this… I have dealt with such elements for 23 years.”

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Gives Time To Arvind Kejriwal & Others To Respond In ED’s Plea Against Trial Court Remarks

Today, On 19th March, The Delhi High Court has granted Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and other AAP leaders one week to file their replies to the Enforcement Directorate’s plea seeking removal of adverse remarks, rejecting their request for four weeks’ time.

Delhi High Court Dismisses Alapan Bandyopadhyay’s Review Plea Against Transfer of His Case to Delhi

Today, On 19th February, The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition filed by former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay. The petition had challenged the court’s 2022 decision upholding the CAT Chairman’s order to transfer his case from Kolkata Bench to Delhi.

“How Will a Film Affect Trial?” Kerala High Court Questions Plea to Stop Movie Inspired by Venjaramoodu Mass Murder

The Kerala High Court expressed strong doubts over a plea seeking to restrain the release of a Malayalam film allegedly inspired by the Venjaramoodu mass murder case. The Court questioned how a creative artwork could interfere with a fair criminal trial and agreed to hear the matter further.

Interfered During I-PAC Raids, Participated in Dharna: ED Urges Supreme Court to Suspend WB DGP

The Enforcement Directorate has moved the Supreme Court seeking suspension of West Bengal DGP Rajeev Kumar, alleging interference in the I-PAC raid on Pratik Jain. It also reminded the Court that Kumar earlier joined a dharna with Mamata Banerjee. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) submitted a new petition to the Supreme Court, seeking to suspend West […]

National Herald Twist: Magistrate Told Police to Give FIR to Gandhi’s — Sessions Court Stopped It Within 48 Hours

A Delhi Magistrate ordered the police to inform Rahul and Sonia Gandhi about the FIR in the National Herald case and give them a copy. But the Sessions Court quickly stayed the order after the police challenged it.