Outgoing CJI BR Gavai strongly defended his 2024 judgment on applying the creamy layer principle to Scheduled Castes, saying real equality must consider social and economic reality. He stressed that political interference often overrides constitutional logic and true justice.
Justice B.R. Gavai’s remarks after the Pahalgam attack emphasize peace and dialogue over war, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional values. His call for restraint over retaliation reflects India’s tradition of non-violence, embodying the principles of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Gavai advocates for civil liberties amidst rising tensions.
Justice Bela M. Trivedi, born on June 10, 1960, has served as a judge since 1995, assuming her current role on August 31, 2021. With 79 authored judgments, she is noted for her impactful decisions, including significant cases on sexual assault definitions and affirmative action within reserved categories. She retires on May 9, 2025.
The Supreme Court of India issued a landmark ruling on November 5, determining that not all private property is a community resource. This decision prompted dissent from Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Sudhanshu Dhulia, who criticized the majority’s characterization of prior judicial doctrines, highlighting the importance of dissenting opinions in shaping legal interpretations and promoting transparency.
In an exclusive interview, outgoing Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud discussed the balance between regulating hate speech and preserving free expression. He defended India’s reservation system for promoting equality, emphasized the judiciary’s role in democracy, and underscored the importance of fair compensation for judges, acknowledging his contributions to rights and transparency during his tenure.
On Tuesday( 23rd April), Justice Gautam Patel of the Bombay High Court emphasized the importance of judges seeking quick solutions instead of solely focusing on drafting judgments. In a farewell event, he stated that not every issue requires a formal judgment and that intervention is essential for speedy problem resolution. Justice Patel also shared plans for retirement, expressing disinterest in spending an entire day in arbitrations and highlighting the need to educate law students on fundamental legal subjects due to recent observations with court clerks.
