Punjab and Haryana High Court Seeks Response from Judicial Magistrate Over Bail Granted to Relative; The Registrar General has also been directed to inform whether any administrative inquiry has been initiated regarding the alleged misconduct in granting bail.
During a criminal contempt hearing, Calcutta High Court judges and TMC MP Kalyan Bandyopadhyay engaged in humorous exchanges. Bandyopadhyay noted a parliamentary meeting agenda concerning judicial ethics, prompting witty remarks from the judges about the law’s creation and challenges. The interaction showcased a playful atmosphere amidst serious legal discussions.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud emphasized that if an individual judge has concerns about a decision, the appropriate course of action is to discuss it with the chief justice. He highlighted the importance of internal dialogue within the judiciary. Open communication, he noted, helps maintain institutional integrity. His remarks underscore the need for judicial cooperation and consensus.
The Supreme Court collegium, led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, conducted interviews for high court judgeships to improve candidate evaluation. This follows controversies involving Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s remarks at a VHP event, raising concerns about judicial impartiality. The collegium aims to enhance transparency and integrity in judicial appointments through personal interactions.
![[VHP Event] NGO Writes To CJI Khanna Seeks ‘In-house’ Inquiry Against Allahabad HC Judge For His Remarks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-11-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Prashant Bhushan, representing the NGO CJAR, criticized Justice Yadav for his comments at a VHP event, claiming they undermine judicial impartiality and erode public trust. The letter requests an in-house inquiry and highlights concerns about the judge’s remarks targeting Muslims, advocating for the Uniform Civil Code, and violating judicial ethics.