Ex-CJI BR Gavai said he continued court proceedings on instinct and chose not to seek action against the lawyer who attempted to hurl a shoe at him inside the Supreme Court. He stressed that calmness and respect for judicial decorum guided his decision despite the act being termed contempt.
The Kerala High Court expressed deep shock after a woman litigant, claiming to be a lawyer, made outrageous remarks against the judges during her hearing. The Bench said her statements breached all norms of civility and were deeply perverse.
Jharkhand High Court dismissed the third anticipatory bail plea of Harish Kumar Pathak, stressing that “judicial decorum no less than legal propriety” must prevail and ruling that there can be no revival of ‘reasons to believe’ in repeat applications.
Justice Shekhar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court canceled his participation in a seminar linked to the Ram Mandir movement, refuting claims that he was a keynote speaker after a misleading poster circulated on social media. His decision followed previous controversies, raising questions about his public remarks and judicial conduct.
During a discussion on CJI DY Chandrachud’s legacy, retired Justice RC Chavan criticized his concern for public perception, deeming it inappropriate for a judge. While some praised Chandrachud’s judgment style, others noted limited reforms and urged judges to prioritize impartiality over legacy. Chavan also raised concerns about hastily introduced livestreaming of court proceedings.
The Supreme Court of India, today (21st Oct)led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, dismissed a petition by Dr. SN Kundra aimed at replacing “Hindutva” with “Bharatiya Samvidhanatva.” The court deemed the plea a “complete abuse of the process,” reflecting hesitation to alter foundational political concepts, despite concerns over religious nationalism’s impact on governance.
The Bar Council of India urged Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud to reform courtroom decorum in High Courts, citing unacceptable judicial behavior towards advocates. The letter emphasized implementing a clear code of conduct for judges, psychological evaluations, and addressing concerns over the unauthorized circulation of court proceedings, which undermine judicial integrity.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court issued a notice to lawyer Sanjeev Kumar for posting contemptuous comments during a video conference hearing. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta ordered Kumar to explain why contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated against him. The court emphasized the need to maintain decorum and respect for the judicial process.
New delhi: The recent statement “We will rip you apart” by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah sparked a debate about judicial decorum. Judges expressed concern over the appropriateness of such language for a high judicial position, citing the need for impartial discussions and maintaining sobriety in court proceedings. Past rulings emphasize the high standards of behavior expected from judges.
