“UP Govt Officers Care Only When Summoned”: Allahabad High Court Slams “Lackadaisical Attitude” Towards Court Orders

Allahabad High Court criticized UP officers for ignoring court orders until contempt notices or personal appearances are ordered. The Court dismissed a delayed state appeal, calling it a result of administrative negligence.

Supreme Court Criticises Punjab and Haryana Bar Council Over Bar Election Disputes

The Supreme Court of India criticized the Bar Council’s unclear position on Karnal and Rohtak bar elections, ordering urgent High Court hearings. It granted interim relief to lawyers involved in cases of electoral irregularities, emphasizing the need for transparency and proper procedures in future elections. The Court also called for a retired judge’s supervision.

Supreme Court Refuses to Quash FIRs Against Two for Praising Afzal Guru, Criticising Judges: “Language Used by Petitioners Is Highly Objectionable”

Today, On 29th April, Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against two accused of praising Afzal Guru, criticising judges. However, it allowed all FIRs to be clubbed and transferred to a Madurai court for a joint trial.

Supreme Court Declines PIL Against Misuse of Anti-Dowry, DV Laws : “Lawyers Must Always Avoid Being a Litigant or a Surety”

Today, On 27th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the misuse of anti-dowry and domestic violence laws, emphasizing that lawyers should avoid becoming litigants. “An advocate must always avoid being a litigant,” the Court remarked, directing Advocate Vishal Tiwari to withdraw the plea. The Court’s statement highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in the legal field. Tiwari ultimately chose to withdraw the petition following the Court’s observation.

“Supreme Court Institution is Greater Than Individual Judges”: Justice BV Nagarathna Objects CJI’s Remarks on Justice Krishna Iyer’s Community Resources Judgment

Today, On 5th November, Justice B.V. Nagarathna criticized Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his remarks about former judges, emphasizing that the Supreme Court’s institution transcends individual judges. She argued past judges should not be criticized for differing viewpoints, as their rulings aligned with the historical context of their times. Future judges should avoid unjust criticisms.