Allahabad High Court criticized UP officers for ignoring court orders until contempt notices or personal appearances are ordered. The Court dismissed a delayed state appeal, calling it a result of administrative negligence.
The Supreme Court of India criticized the Bar Council’s unclear position on Karnal and Rohtak bar elections, ordering urgent High Court hearings. It granted interim relief to lawyers involved in cases of electoral irregularities, emphasizing the need for transparency and proper procedures in future elections. The Court also called for a retired judge’s supervision.
Today, On 29th April, Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against two accused of praising Afzal Guru, criticising judges. However, it allowed all FIRs to be clubbed and transferred to a Madurai court for a joint trial.
Today, On 27th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the misuse of anti-dowry and domestic violence laws, emphasizing that lawyers should avoid becoming litigants. “An advocate must always avoid being a litigant,” the Court remarked, directing Advocate Vishal Tiwari to withdraw the plea. The Court’s statement highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in the legal field. Tiwari ultimately chose to withdraw the petition following the Court’s observation.
Today, On 5th November, Justice B.V. Nagarathna criticized Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his remarks about former judges, emphasizing that the Supreme Court’s institution transcends individual judges. She argued past judges should not be criticized for differing viewpoints, as their rulings aligned with the historical context of their times. Future judges should avoid unjust criticisms.
