The Supreme Court set aside a contempt conviction against a Navi Mumbai woman who called judges part of a “dog mafia,” stressing that contempt power protects the institution, not individual judges. The Court said mercy must guide decisions when genuine remorse is shown.
The Gujarat High Court has criticised Ahmedabad Police for repeatedly imposing Section 144 without any real emergency, calling the practice arbitrary and unconstitutional. The ruling came in a petition filed by anti-CAA protesters who said the state used the law to suppress peaceful dissent.
Former CJI BR Gavai clarifies his statement on Lord Vishnu during the Khajuraho temple case, saying social media misrepresented his words. He stresses criticism of judgments is fine, but personal attacks on judges are unacceptable.
Today, On 19th November, The Kerala High Court criticised the poor crowd control at Sabarimala, noting that the situation went out of control due to a complete lack of proper coordination among officials. The court demanded immediate corrective measures from the administration.
The Supreme Court criticised a West Bengal magistrate for wrongly saying he lost jurisdiction after failing to meet a six-week trial deadline. The Bench stressed judges must seek time extension, not abandon cases.
After a Supreme Court order, six Jammu and Kashmir policemen were arrested for brutally torturing a fellow policeman. The apex court described it as the “most barbaric instance of police atrocity,” sparking shock and raising serious questions of accountability.
Allahabad High Court criticized UP officers for ignoring court orders until contempt notices or personal appearances are ordered. The Court dismissed a delayed state appeal, calling it a result of administrative negligence.
The Supreme Court of India criticized the Bar Council’s unclear position on Karnal and Rohtak bar elections, ordering urgent High Court hearings. It granted interim relief to lawyers involved in cases of electoral irregularities, emphasizing the need for transparency and proper procedures in future elections. The Court also called for a retired judge’s supervision.
Today, On 29th April, Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against two accused of praising Afzal Guru, criticising judges. However, it allowed all FIRs to be clubbed and transferred to a Madurai court for a joint trial.
Today, On 27th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the misuse of anti-dowry and domestic violence laws, emphasizing that lawyers should avoid becoming litigants. “An advocate must always avoid being a litigant,” the Court remarked, directing Advocate Vishal Tiwari to withdraw the plea. The Court’s statement highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in the legal field. Tiwari ultimately chose to withdraw the petition following the Court’s observation.
