The Allahabad High Court judge candidly recorded that he was “hungry, tired and physically incapacitated” after hearing a matter beyond working hours due to a heavy cause list and a deadline set by the Supreme Court of India. The rare remark highlights the intense workload and mounting pressure on High Court judges amid massive case pendency.
The Supreme Court today (18th Dec) reserved judgment on a petition advocating for a comprehensive rehabilitation framework and enhanced victim protection in human trafficking cases. Senior Advocate Aparna Bhat argued the lack of effective institutional measures, emphasizing the need for a specialized agency, while the Union contended existing laws and structures are adequate for addressing trafficking.
Today, On 17th December, The Supreme Court deliberating on the case of two female judicial officers dismissed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, who argue their terminations were punitive and lacked fairness. Both were on probation, with claims of unfair disciplinary processes. The court has reserved judgment, considering issues of justice and procedural rights.
The Supreme Court, today (24th Sept) led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, will review petitions on Sept 24 concerning sub-classification within Scheduled Castes for reservation benefits. The Court had previously ruled that states can implement such classifications based on data demonstrating backwardness. This decision overturned a past ruling affirming SCs as a homogeneous class.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI Chandrachud, today reserved judgment on whether an ineligible person can nominate an arbitrator. Solicitor General Mehta emphasized strengthening arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. The Court discussed significant questions of law and the challenges in the arbitrator selection process, with a focus on party autonomy and potential injustice.
Today(on 19th April), The Supreme Court of India has reserved its judgment on the legality of downloading and viewing child pornography under the current legal framework, challenging a prior decision by the Madras High Court. The case involves complex legal interpretations surrounding the possession and intent of child pornography, sparking a broader societal discussion on youth pornography addiction and exploitation.
