Jharkhand High Court judge slammed an IAS officer during a land compensation case, calling him ‘monkey’ and questioning corruption: ‘Commission chahiye aapko? Inquiry karwae?’ sparks viral reactions.
Jharkhand High Court has adjourned Rahul Gandhi’s petition challenging criminal proceedings in the Chaibasa MP-MLA court over alleged defamatory remarks against Amit Shah. The matter will be heard again after two weeks.
Today, On 25th August, A Sambhal court has postponed the hearing in the case filed against Congress MP Rahul Gandhi over his alleged “fighting Indian State” remark. The matter will now be taken up for further proceedings on September 26.
Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance after a BIT Mesra student was molested and slashed with a blade, sparking student protests and raising serious campus safety concerns.
The Supreme Court directed Jharkhand High Court to either let a single parent judge stay in Hazaribagh or transfer her to Bokaro, keeping her son’s Class 12 exams in mind. The CJI emphasized, “High courts should act as parents to their judicial officers.”
Jharkhand High Court orders BIT Mesra to pay Rs 20 lakh compensation in Dalit student’s death case, directing safety SOPs for all colleges to ensure campus security and student protection.
The Supreme Court has directed Jharkhand High Court judges to take sanctioned leave of 10-12 weeks to write long-pending judgments. This move aims to clear backlogs and deliver timely justice to litigants waiting for verdicts.
Today, On 6th August, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi was granted bail by a Jharkhand court in a 2018 defamation case linked to remarks against Amit Shah. He appeared as directed by the High Court and secured bail during the hearing.
The Jharkhand High Court seeks detailed action reports on banned meat sale, illegal slaughterhouses, and food safety violations, demanding affidavits from the State and police authorities.
The Jharkhand High Court criticised the railway police for summoning a lawyer defending an accused. It said, “Summoning of advocate by investigating officer is disturbing,” and emphasised that client-lawyer communication is privileged under law.
