The Supreme Court of India has upheld the bail of Ammar Rehman, accused of ISIS links, stating insufficient evidence from his phone to prove his membership. While the trial continues, he cannot travel without court permission. This case emphasizes the necessity of strong evidence in legal processes, even in terrorism-related accusations.
Today, On 16th October, the Indian government opposed Zakir Naik’s Supreme Court petition to consolidate multiple FIRs against him, questioning how a fugitive could seek legal remedy from abroad. Naik, facing money laundering and hate speech charges, aims to streamline his defense amidst ongoing investigations related to alleged terror links and communal instigation.
