IndiGo’s Pilot Fatigue Norms: Madras HC Asks DGCA if It Will Extend the Exemption Granted to the Airline

The Madras High Court has requested the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to clarify its stance on an exemption given to InterGlobe Aviation, operator of IndiGo airlines, regarding pilot fatigue regulations under India’s aviation safety standards.

IndiGo Flight Chaos: Delhi High Court PIL Demands 4x Compensation for Stranded Passengers

A PIL has been filed in Delhi High Court seeking four times the ticket price as compensation for passengers affected by IndiGo flight cancellations after new FDTL rules. The petition also calls for an inquiry into DGCA’s role in the nationwide aviation disruption.

Pilot Fatigue Row: Delhi High Court Seeks DGCA Response On Alleged Violation Of CAR 2024 Norms

Today, On 16th December, Delhi High Court has sought a response from the DGCA on a contempt plea by pilot unions alleging illegal relaxations to airlines and approval of fatigue management schemes contrary to CAR 2024 safety norms governing flight duty limits.

My Son Is a Pilot with IndiGo: Justice Shail Jain Recuses as Airline Moves Delhi HC for Rs.900 Crore Customs Duty Refund

Today, On 12th December, InterGlobe Aviation, which operates IndiGo, has moved the Delhi High Court seeking a refund of more than Rs.900 crore paid as customs duty on re-imported aircraft engines and parts. Justice Shail Jain recused, stating, “My son is a pilot with IndiGo.”

IndiGo vs Mahindra: Mediation Fails in ‘6E’ Trademark Dispute, Delhi High Court Trial Next

Mediation between IndiGo Airlines and Mahindra Electric over the ‘6E/6e’ trademark has failed. The Delhi High Court will now take the case to trial in February 2026.

Mahindra Before Delhi HC: “Renamed Vehicle to BE 6E to BE 6. Will Not Use ‘6E’ Mark Till Disposal of IndiGo Suit

IndiGo is asserting its “6E” trademark rights against Mahindra Electric, which agreed to rename its upcoming electric vehicle from “BE 6E” to “BE 6” amid the legal dispute. Mahindra plans to contest the lawsuit while the court has scheduled a hearing for April 2025, highlighting the significance of trademark usage over mere registration.