Delhi High Court Orders Takedown of Deepfake Videos, Safeguards Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary’s Name, Voice & Image

The Delhi High Court has protected journalist Sudhir Chaudhary’s personality rights, ordering the removal of AI-generated and deepfake content from social media. Uploaders have 48 hours to comply, failing which Google and Meta will act.

Kerala High Court Slams Social Media Platforms, Orders Immediate Takedown of Vulgar Edits Targeting 14-Year-Old Girl

The Kerala High Court ordered YouTube and Instagram to remove offensive edits of a minor girl’s movie review that were distorted to mock her. The girl’s mother petitioned the court after attempts to report the videos failed. The ruling emphasizes the platforms’ legal obligation to protect children’s content from harm.

Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Ban Social Media for Kids Below 13: “Issue Falls Within Domain of Policy-Making”

Today, On 4th April, The Supreme Court refused to consider a plea seeking a social media ban for children under 13. It said that such matters should be handled by the government, not the court. The petition claimed that too much screen time is causing a mental health crisis among children. It urged stricter rules, but the court left the decision to policymakers.

British Woman Raped in Delhi Hotel by Instagram Friend – Accused Arrested | Understand Rape Laws in India

A British woman who traveled to Delhi to meet an Instagram friend was allegedly raped in a Mahipalpur hotel. The police arrested the accused, Kailash, for rape, while his friend Wasim was booked for molestation.

Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi in FIR Over Instagram Post Featuring Controversial Poem

The Supreme Court has issued a notice regarding a plea from Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi, challenging a Gujarat High Court decision that refused to quash an FIR linked to his Instagram post featuring a poem. The court granted interim relief, halting any action on the FIR until the next hearing on February 10.

Trademark Infringement | Delhi HC Restrains ‘PhonePey Loan’ Usage in ‘PhonePe’

Today, On 24th December, The Delhi High Court restrained the use of the name ‘PhonePey Loan’ in a trademark case filed by PhonePe. The court also ordered GoDaddy to take down the ‘PhonePey Loan’ website. PhonePe raised concerns that the name was too similar to its trademark. The court’s decision is to avoid any confusion among users.

[Drugs Haul Case] “This Is Mamta Kulkarni… I’m Overwhelmed & Emotional”: Actress Returns to India After 24 Years, Shares Emotional Video

Bollywood actress Mamta Kulkarni has returned to India after 24 years following her exoneration in a high-profile Rs. 2,000 crore drug case. Her emotional homecoming was marked by a heartfelt video reflecting on her journey. Kulkarni’s lengthy legal battle kept her away, but her return has excited fans eager for her on-screen presence.

“Misinterpretations in Law Can Lead to Costly Mistakes”: Concerns Rise Over Legal Influencers on Social Media

The rise of legal influencers on social media has raised concerns about the potential for misleading legal advice. Experts highlight the risks of individuals relying on unqualified sources, which can result in serious legal and financial consequences. Caution is advised, stressing the importance of consulting qualified professionals for accurate guidance.

Instagram Post Targeting “Complan”|| Delhi HC Directs Health Influencer to Remove Video

Today, On 26th September, the Delhi High Court ordered Prashant Desai to remove an Instagram video criticizing Zydus’s trademarked product, Complan. The court found the video to be disparaging and ruled against trademark infringement following Zydus’s lawsuit. Desai has two weeks to take down the content from all platforms.

[Right to Privacy] Kolkata Rape & Murder Case| Plea in Supreme Court to Shield Victim’s Identity

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court regarding the rape and murder of a female trainee doctor in Kolkata, seeking to protect the victim’s identity from being shared on social media. Complainants argue that the dissemination of her photo and family details is damaging their reputation. The case is scheduled to be heard on August 20.