The Delhi High Court has requested responses from the Central Government and the Boxing Federation of India regarding a petition by Anurag Thakur and the Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association about election disputes. Scheduled for an August hearing, this case, alongside a similar petition, highlights governance challenges in Indian sports and may influence future election conduct.
The Supreme Court of India criticized the surge of non-urgent cases during its summer vacation, with Justice Surya Kant noting that 70% lacked urgency. The bench addressed a petition from the Vidarbha Hockey Association regarding associate membership, ultimately rejecting it due to substantial delays and inadequate legal reasoning.
The apex court reinforced the “One State, One Unit” policy, which is followed by the Indian Olympic Association. Under this rule, only one sports association per state can be officially affiliated with national bodies like Hockey India. New Delhi – 26th May: The Supreme Court of India has refused to accept the Vidarbha Hockey Association’s […]
Today, On 4th April, The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the rejection of its ad-hoc panel for the Bihar Olympic Association. The plea seeks reconsideration of the decision and a fresh start to the management process. The IOA’s counsel suggested restarting the procedure from the formation of a fact-finding committee. The court has scheduled the next hearing to allow the counsel to finalize instructions.
Today, On 6th January, Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud recused himself from hearing petitions related to the constitutions of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) and the All India Football Federation (AIFF). The cases involve crucial issues concerning the governance and structure of these sports bodies. The CJI cited potential conflict of interest or personal reasons for stepping aside. A new bench will now be assigned to handle the matter.
Vidushpat Singhania, representing the Indian Olympic Association, stated that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) provided only a brief rejection of Vinesh Phogat’s appeal for her disqualification. The decision can be appealed to the Swiss Federal Tribunal within 30 days. Vinesh Phogat was disqualified from the Paris Olympics 2024 for exceeding the weight limit by 100 grams. Despite efforts to reduce her weight, she was unable to meet the criteria, leading to her disqualification and subsequent retirement from wrestling. Sarah Ann Hildebrandt won the gold medal in the women’s 50kg freestyle event.
Today, On 14th August, The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Paris rejected Vinesh Phogat’s appeal for a silver medal in the 50kg women’s wrestling at the Paris Olympics 2024, following her disqualification due to a minor weight discrepancy. The case, involving renowned figures in the legal community, has attracted significant attention and awaits a crucial verdict.
On Monday(12th August), Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra criticised the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) for mishandling Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification due to her weight, especially during the Wrestling Federation of India’s (WFI) suspension. He highlighted that the case progressed due to the timely intervention of pro bono lawyers.
![[Breaking] Paris Olympics 2024| CAS Postpones Verdict on Vinesh Phogat’s Appeal to August 16](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-47-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) postponed its decision on Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification controversy until August 13, fueling uncertainty and high attention. Phogat’s appeal regarding her disqualification due to a minor weight margin has drawn widespread interest, including involvement from the International Olympic Committee and the Indian Olympic Association. Senior Advocate Harish Salve represents Phogat in this pivotal legal battle.
Today(9th August), Harish Salve, a prominent Indian lawyer, will represent the IOA in the CAS hearing for wrestler Vinesh Phogat’s Paris Olympics disqualification. His extensive legal experience is vital in addressing the complex case. The hearing could potentially impact Phogat’s retirement decision, urging her to reconsider, and has broader implications for Indian wrestling’s global representation.