Justice Abhay Oka announced that the Supreme Court of India is translating key judgments into regional languages to enhance accessibility to justice. This initiative aims to help citizens understand court decisions in their mother tongue and marks a significant step in simplifying the legal system for everyone, fostering engagement with legal rights.
The Supreme Court of India has upheld the bail of Ammar Rehman, accused of ISIS links, stating insufficient evidence from his phone to prove his membership. While the trial continues, he cannot travel without court permission. This case emphasizes the necessity of strong evidence in legal processes, even in terrorism-related accusations.
The Allahabad High Court denied bail to a man convicted under IPC Section 304, ruling that Haj is not an absolute right and expressing concern that allowing travel could increase the risk of him absconding.
The Kerala High Court has ruled that gold and cash given to a woman during marriage are her personal property, known as ‘Streedhan’. The court emphasized the need for practical approaches in such cases due to the lack of documented evidence. This landmark decision aims to protect women’s rights regarding their wedding gifts.
Researchers at IIIT-Hyderabad have developed a groundbreaking method to improve legal document retrieval, revolutionizing how lawyers access and utilize past judgments.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was a visionary jurist and social reformer who played a pivotal role in shaping modern India’s legal and constitutional framework.
Today(11th Sept),The Supreme Court of India, during a matrimonial dispute hearing, highlighted that Section 498A of the IPC and the Domestic Violence Act have become some of the most abused laws in the country. The observation was made by Justice BR Gavai and his Bench, focusing on the misuse of these legal provisions.
Delhi High Court directs Arya Samaj Temples to ensure genuine marriage witnesses, emphasizing relatives or long-time acquaintances. Court voided a marriage due to false affidavits on the uncle’s marital status. Girl of legal age refused to accompany petitioner, court states no further orders, but uncle’s wife is free to pursue criminal complaint and police can investigate.
Delhi High Court prohibits parole based on maintaining conjugal relations with live-in partners, citing absence of right to conceive, particularly when convict’s legal spouse is alive, in recent ruling by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that engaging in unnatural sex with one’s spouse does not constitute rape under Indian law, as marital rape is not recognized. The decision has sparked debates on marital rape and the importance of consent in matrimonial relationships, highlighting the need for legal reforms to address gaps in existing laws and ensure comprehensive protection against sexual violence within marriage.
