The Supreme Court has directed all High Court Chief Justices to review long-pending cases under laws like UAPA and ensure speedy trials. The court said the State must support accused facing “reverse burden” laws and prevent unnecessary delays.
The Delhi High Court issued notice to the Central government and CCI on Apple’s plea challenging penalties on global turnover. CCI argued the law ensures even companies with no base in India can be penalised for anti-competitive practices.
The Kerala High Court ruled that cultivating cannabis plants, even in pots on a terrace, is an offence under the NDPS Act. Justice C.S. Dias clarified that the law punishes the conscious act of growing cannabis, regardless of whether it’s done in soil or containers.
The Allahabad High Court has clarified that a wife can file for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC against her minor husband. However, the legal liability to pay arises only after the husband attains the age of majority.
The Supreme Court dismissed that a promise of marriage followed by a consensual relationship does not amount to rape, as it dismissed a POCSO case filed against a man who later withdrew his marriage proposal.
Former CJI DY Chandrachud supported the Uniform Civil Code, saying the Constitution desires it. He urged inclusive implementation by taking all communities into confidence.
The Supreme Court rejected a request to shift the Waqf Act case from Delhi High Court, remarking, “Petitions are nowadays being filed only for the newspapers” and questioned the urgency behind rushing to court.
CJI BR Gavai visited Gray’s Inn, where Dr. Ambedkar studied law, to commemorate 75 years of the Indian Constitution. He emphasized Ambedkar’s legacy and its impact on his life as a Dalit judiciary leader. Gavai highlighted the Constitution’s principles of equality and justice, celebrating Ambedkar’s enduring relevance in Indian democracy.
Jyoti Rani’s lawyer, Kumar Mukesh, pledges to defend her espionage case amidst online backlash, asserting her innocence under Indian law. Jyoti, currently in judicial custody, is accused of sharing sensitive data with Pakistan. Mukesh plans to file a bail petition after reviewing case documents, which have yet to be received.
The Delhi High Court ruled that Indian law does not recognize marital rape, cancelling charges against a husband under Section 377 IPC due to a lack of clear consent denial from the wife. The case highlights the absence of legal provisions against marital rape, emphasizing ongoing debates regarding women’s rights and sexual autonomy in India.
