Kerala High Court held that a wife is entitled to half share in property registered solely in her husband’s name if her monetary contribution is proved, stating the transaction “partakes the character of a trust.” The Court ruled that Section 92 of the Evidence Act cannot prevent her from claiming her rightful share.
Bombay High Court ruled that an under-construction flat not in possession of either spouse doesn’t qualify as a “shared household” under the DV Act. Hence, the husband cannot be forced to pay pending EMIs.
The Supreme Court of India has increased permanent alimony for Rakhi Sadhukhan from Rs 20,000 to Rs 50,000 monthly and mandated a 5% increase every two years. The court also ordered the transfer of her ex-husband’s property, highlighting the importance of marital living standards and providing a significant precedent for future maintenance cases.
The Gauhati High Court upheld a wife’s maintenance claim after challenging a Sessions Court’s denial, which cited contradictions in her testimony. The High Court recognized her valid reasons for separation due to physical harassment linked to her child’s complexion. The dismissal of her claim was reversed, reaffirming her right to maintenance.
An Ahmedabad court ruled that a woman divorced for adultery is still entitled to maintenance. The court cited delayed allegations and evidence of domestic violence.
