The Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed flexibility in filing new cases under either newly implemented or old criminal laws, stressing that the Registry cannot object based on the chosen legal framework. The recent implementation of three new criminal laws in India has sparked controversy amid efforts to modernize and Indianize the justice system, with some states considering state-level amendments in response.
The Madras High Court Advocates’ Association (MHCAA) unanimously decided to boycott court proceedings on July 8 to protest three new criminal laws. The resolution emphasized the need for members’ support and cooperation for the protest’s success, citing concerns about the impact on justice and fairness in the legal system.
A Mumbai court convicted 65-year-old Kailash Singh for kicking a dog to death, sentencing him under the IPC and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court imposed a Rs. 30,000 fine, emphasizing strong evidence of guilt. The accused’s self-defense claim was dismissed, serving as a deterrent for future cruelty.
The Delhi High Court ruled that WhatsApp chats cannot be admitted as evidence in court without proper certification under the Indian Evidence Act. This decision came in the case of Dell International Services India Private Limited v. Adeel Feroze, addressing delays in filing a written statement in a consumer dispute complaint. The ruling highlights the need for certification of electronic evidence and adherence to procedural timelines in consumer disputes.
Today, On 1st July, The Jharkhand High Court identified a critical error in Universal LexisNexis’ Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and initiated a suo motu case. The error in Section 103(2) of the criminal law could lead to unjust outcomes. The publisher was directed to issue a corrigendum in national newspapers and update all distributed materials to prevent potential injustice.
Today(on 1st July), Grassroots lawyers at Calcutta High Court boycotted proceedings to protest against new criminal laws, causing significant disruption as cases couldn’t proceed without legal representation. The protest underscores widespread discontent among lawyers and led to multiple judges adjourning hearings due to absent lawyers, affecting litigants from various districts.
The Indian government is set to amend the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), replacing the Indian Penal Code, to include a section on sexual crimes against men and transgender persons. Three new criminal laws are taking effect, despite objections from opposition-led states, aiming to overhaul the country’s criminal justice framework and implement technological advancements in evidence recording and filing procedures.
Today, On 26th June, President Droupadi Murmu emphasized prioritizing justice over punishment with the introduction of new criminal laws, aiming to expedite judicial proceedings. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 will replace outdated British-era laws, aligning with Indian values and emphasizing comprehensive justice for all.
Transforming Justice: A New Era in Indian Criminal Law with Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam India has recently embarked on a historic transformation of its criminal justice system, marked by President Droupadi Murmu’s assent to three significant criminal law bills. These new laws, which replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), […]
The Central Government of India recently introduced a revised set of criminal reform bills in the Lok Sabha, following the withdrawal of their earlier versions. Home Minister Amit Shah presented three key bills: ‘The Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, 2023‘, ‘The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, 2023′, and ‘The Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, 2023‘. These bills […]