Justice Gavai of the Supreme Court emphasized that reservation policies cannot apply to constitutional appointments, requiring merit-based selections. He advocated for continued reservation for underprivileged communities while insisting on transparency and integrity in judiciary appointments. His personal pledge to refrain from post-retirement roles highlights a commitment to judicial independence and reform in India’s reservation approach.
Today, On 30th April, The Supreme Court declared digital access a fundamental right and issued 20 directions to simplify the KYC process for visually impaired and acid attack victims, ensuring they can complete it without discrimination or unnecessary hardship.
Today, On 22nd April, The Supreme Court said High Courts cannot use the special power under Article 142 meant only for the top court. It rejected a plea and added that only the Supreme Court can give such orders for full justice in any case.
The Supreme Court will take up multiple petitions concerning religious conversions Today (April 16). These pleas question the legality and implications of forced or fraudulent conversions across the country.
Today, On 14th April, Justice BR Gavai remarked, “Even though I belong to an Suvarna Class, I proudly refer to the Constitution as Bhimsmriti,” highlighting his respect for Dr Ambedkar’s vision. He shared this during a lecture on Ambedkar’s contribution to nation-building.
Today, On 14th April, If the Basic Structure doctrine ever goes, we could witness another Jallianwala Bagh,” remarked Former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman. He made this statement during the launch event of his book titled The Basic Structure Doctrine.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that failure to inform an arrested person of the grounds for their arrest violates Article 22 of the Constitution. In the case of Manjeet Singh, the court cancelled his remand order due to this lapse, emphasizing the magistrate’s duty to ensure compliance with constitutional safeguards.
The Supreme Court will take up multiple petitions concerning religious conversions on April 16. These pleas question the legality and implications of forced or fraudulent conversions across the country. The issue has sparked widespread debate over religious freedom and state regulations. The court’s hearing is expected to clarify the legal stance on the matter.
The Delhi High Court, in the Vikas Chawla case, referenced Justice H.R. Khanna’s historic dissent in ADM Jabalpur to emphasize the importance of personal liberty. The court criticized procedural lapses that led to violations of fundamental rights, reinforcing that due process cannot be compromised. It reiterated that constitutional protections must prevail over administrative expediency. This judgment highlights the judiciary’s role in safeguarding individual freedoms against arbitrary state action.
Today, On 26th March, The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed against rapper Yo Yo Honey Singh’s song ‘Maniac’. The petition had raised objections to the song’s lyrics, alleging they were inappropriate. However, the petitioner later sought to withdraw the case, and the court granted permission. With this decision, the legal challenge against the song has come to an end.
