The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of a soldier with Schizophrenia, granting him a disability pension after criticizing the lack of proper justification in the Medical Board’s report regarding his discharge. The court emphasized a liberal interpretation of laws benefiting individuals and highlighted the necessity for clear reasoning in such cases.
The Delhi High Court tribunal upheld the five-year extension of the ban on Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), citing its continued subversive activities. The group, founded by Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, issued threats to top Indian officials and attempted to incite violence. Authorities highlighted SFJ’s use of social media to spread separatist propaganda. The extension aims to stop its influence and maintain national security.
Yesterday, On 16th July, The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, issued a notice to the Defence Ministry in response to Nagaland’s plea to prosecute 30 Army personnel involved in the Mon killings. This comes after the Central government denied prosecution sanction under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. The incident, which sparked public outcry, occurred during a flawed military operation in December 2021.
Today (9th May) Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, a defendant in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, alleged that Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) officers coerced him to confess and implicated senior right-wing leaders. He claimed he was tortured and falsely accused, with witnesses being coerced. Purohit also accused the ATS of planting evidence and named individuals involved in his interrogation.
Today (29th April): Uttarakhand’s devastating forest fires prompt urgent Supreme Court petition filing for listing. The destruction of approximately 33.34 hectares of forest land has led to heightened efforts, with the Indian Army and Air Force joining firefighting operations. Former Chief Minister criticizes government’s response. Fresh incidents continue, emphasizing the need for immediate action.
The Allahabad High Court initiated a suo motu PIL to investigate encroachment allegations on Indian Army land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The Court emphasized the importance of protecting defense land and scheduled the next hearing after three weeks to allow all parties to present their arguments. The Ministry of Defence is expected to respond to the allegations.
Today(on 26th April), The Delhi High Court has directed the Defence Ministry to decide the plea for women’s inclusion in the Armed Forces through CDS exam within 8 weeks. The plea was submitted by Advocate Kush Kalra and highlights the issue of gender discrimination in the recruitment process, emphasizing the urgency of ensuring equal opportunities.
The Manipur Tribal Forum raised concerns about violence against the Kuki-Zo tribal community. They have filed a plea with the Supreme Court, citing threats and lack of action from law enforcement. The Forum seeks urgent relief and the arrest of perpetrators. The Supreme Court addressing several petitions related to violence in Manipur.
Today (15th April): The Supreme Court of India has allowed women officers in the Indian Army to legally challenge a newly introduced promotion policy, specifically the mandatory two-year higher course requirement which they argue hampers their career progression. This decision provides a formal legal avenue for addressing grievances against the new policy, advancing gender equality within the Army.
The Delhi High Court has acknowledged The Caravan’s plea regarding alleged army atrocities in Poonch, Jammu, and Kashmir. The central government has been given four weeks to respond, with further deliberation scheduled for May 9. The magazine’s publication raised allegations of torture and murder by the Indian Army, leading to a legal dispute.
