The Delhi High Court has refused to discharge TV Today Network in a criminal defamation case filed by BJP leader Ramesh Bidhuri over a 2011 Aaj Tak report, upholding the Magistrate’s order. The Court ruled that once summons are issued in a summons trial, the Magistrate cannot recall or annul the order.
The News Broadcasting and Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA) pulled up Sudhir Chaudhary for making disrespectful remarks about the LGBTQIA+ community and the Supreme Court during his TV shows. NBDSA ordered Aaj Tak and India Today to edit two clips and delete one video entirely. It criticized Chaudhary for spreading homophobia and violating ethical guidelines in his coverage of the same-sex marriage case. The watchdog also warned him to show more maturity in future broadcasts and comply with journalistic standards.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s farewell ceremony highlighted his transformative legacy, emphasizing his judicial reforms and embrace of technology. His tenure, marked by progressive rulings on civil liberties like same-sex marriage and privacy, left a significant impact on Indian jurisprudence. Legal peers lauded his approach, while some noted missed opportunities on critical issues.
![[Defamation Case] Delhi Court Summons India Today's Aroon Purie For Complaint Filed by Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-110.png?resize=447%2C270&ssl=1)
A Delhi court summoned Aroon Purie and India Today in a defamation case filed by Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai. Rai alleges that the media outlet published articles linking him to conman Sanjay Sherpuria. The legal proceedings highlight the complexities of defamation law in India and the accountability of media executives for published content.
Today(on 22nd April),The Supreme Court is reviewing a plea against the temporary release of four convicts in the Soumya Viswanathan murder case, seeking responses from the Delhi government and the convicts. The convicts, on bail pending appeal, were initially sentenced to life imprisonment. This interim release has sparked controversy and concern among the public and the victim’s family.
On 13th March, The Jharkhand High Court grants protective order to AajTak’s Sudhir Chaudhary, following SC/ST Act complaint. Similar to Supreme Court’s ruling, no coercive actions against him. Allegations stem from comments on tribal community after former Chief Minister’s detention. Supreme Court’s notice to state police prevents coercive steps. High Court aligns stance after apex court’s decree. Jharkhand High Court defers examination of annulment pleas until Supreme Court’s deliberations. Chaudhary’s legal representatives focus on complainants’ allegations only.