Judges Protection Act Doesn’t Override In-House Procedure: Supreme Court in Justice Yashwant Varma Case

Supreme Court holds that in-house inquiries against judges are valid despite the 1985 Protection Act. Justice Yashwant Varma’s challenge to the probe process was rejected.

Justice Yashwant Varma Case | “Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence”: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment

Today, On 30th July, In the Justice Yashwant Varma case, the Supreme Court observed that “your conduct does not inspire confidence” while reserving its judgment on the constitutional challenge to the in-house procedure, raising serious questions over participation in the internal inquiry process.

“Don’t Rush to Contempt”: Ex-Judges Back Lawyer Who Accused Justice GR Swaminathan of Caste Bias

Eight retired Madras High Court judges urged restraint on contempt action against Advocate Vanchinathan. They said only the CJI can act on misconduct claims under SC’s 1995 precedent.

BREAKING | “So You Say That Committee Report Not Worth It?”: Supreme Court To Justice Yashwant Varma, List Matter for Wednesday Hearing

Today, On 28th July, the Supreme Court asked Justice Varma about the credibility of the inquiry panel’s report and scheduled the matter for Wednesday, after strong constitutional objections were raised by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal.

What’s Next for Justice Yashwant Varma? Impeachment Heat Rises After Burnt Cash Discovery

Parliament moves closer to impeaching ex-Delhi HC judge Yashwant Varma after Rs 500 notes found burnt at home. Speaker Om Birla set to form inquiry panel soon.

Kapil Sibal Slams Centre & Supreme Court Over Justice Yashwant Varma Probe: “Without Any Investigation, An Institution Is Being Attacked”

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal criticised the Centre and Supreme Court over the probe into Justice Yashwant Varma, stating, “Without any investigation, an institution is being attacked,” raising serious concerns about judicial independence and fairness.

Kapil Sibal Slams Inquiry Committee: “SC-Appointed Three Member Committee Condemned the Judge Without Providing Him a Chance to Defend Himself”

Today, On 17th June, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal criticised the Supreme Court-appointed inquiry panel, stating, “3-member committee condemned the judge without providing him a chance to defend himself.” He called out the lack of due process and procedural fairness in the probe.

Kapil Sibal Questions Biased Action in Justice Varma & Justice Yadav Cases: “Govt Clearly Wants to Save the Judge”

Kapil Sibal slammed the government for protecting Justice Yadav while targeting Justice Varma, saying, “The government clearly wants to save the judge.” He questioned why the same rules weren’t applied in both cases.

Supreme Court Refuses to Share Report on Cash Recovery at Justice Yashwant Varma’s Residence, Citing RTI Exemptions

The Supreme Court of India denied an RTI request for the inquiry report regarding cash recovery at Justice Yashwant Varma’s residence, citing judicial independence and confidentiality. The investigation followed a fire that uncovered unaccounted cash, with Justice Varma denying corruption allegations. He faces removal recommendations from the Chief Justice.

BREAKING| Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea for FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma; Directs Representation to Authorities First

On May 21, 2025, the Supreme Court of India rejected Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara’s petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma regarding cash found at his residence after a fire. The Court emphasized the need for proper legal channels before pursuing action and highlighted ongoing inquiries previously conducted.