The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of challenges faced by cadets disabled during NDA/IMA training. Over 500 ex-trainees since 1985 struggle without ex-servicemen benefits, relying only on meagre ex-gratia payments.
The Supreme Court closed the misleading advertisements case against Patanjali, observing that once manufacturing of a product is permitted, its advertisement becomes a natural business practice, providing relief to the company after months of legal scrutiny.
The Supreme Court closed the IMA’s case against Patanjali over misleading ads and lifted its stay on the Centre’s deletion of Rule 170. AYUSH medicine ads can now run without prior State licensing approval.
Delhi High Court questions Centre over gender bias in CDS Exam 2025 as PIL challenges exclusion of women from IMA, INA, and AFA entries, demanding equal opportunities in armed forces recruitment.
Today, On 26th March, The Supreme Court has ordered all states and union territories to create a system to handle complaints about misleading advertisements. The court stressed that such ads “can cause great harm to society” and must be strictly regulated. A bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said the public should have a way to report ads violating the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954.
Today, On 7th March, The Supreme Court is set to issue comprehensive directions for enforcing the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. The case stems from a writ petition by the Indian Medical Association (IMA). The IMA seeks action against misleading advertisements promoting allopathic medicines. The ruling aims to curb false medical claims and protect public health.
Highlighting the critical need for enforcing the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, the Court directed all states to strictly implement Rule 170. It cautioned against inaction, stating the urgency of curbing misleading medical claims.
Today, On 15th January, The Supreme Court closed the contempt case against Dr. RV Asokan, President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), for making contemptuous remarks about the court. These comments were made during a press interview while the IMA’s plea against Patanjali Ayurved, regarding misleading advertisements, was still pending. The court found no reason to proceed further with the case. Dr. Asokan had criticized the court’s actions in the ongoing legal matter.
Today, On 9th September, The Indian Medical Association (IMA) in West Bengal stands firm in their support for the ongoing doctors’ strike, despite the Supreme Court’s order to return to duty. The protests are in response to the rape and murder of a postgraduate doctor in Kolkata. The IMA criticizes the court’s decision and emphasizes the need for justice and the fight against healthcare corruption.
The Indian Medical Association (IMA) today announced its intention to file an interlocutory application in the Supreme Court’s suo motu case on the rape and murder of a junior doctor at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital. The IMA aims to engage with MPs to push for central legislation addressing violence against healthcare workers and has requested urgent action on a central law to protect healthcare professionals.
