The Supreme Court has taken suo motu action after observing that the Uttarakhand government remained a “mute spectator” while forest land was being illegally grabbed. The Court ordered a fact-finding inquiry, stopped all construction, and directed the Forest Department to take possession of vacant land.
Delhi High Court penalises a serial litigant for filing multiple pleas against illegal constructions in the national capital. The Court emphasised, “No one should misuse the court’s process for oblique motives,” warning against frivolous petitions that burden the judicial system.
The Supreme Court closed contempt proceedings against IFS officer Rahul after he apologized for moving the Uttarakhand High Court despite the top court hearing the Corbett case. CJI Gavai said, “The majesty of law is not in punishing the guilty but in forgiving.”
The Calcutta High Court ordered the demolition of a tower at Elita Garden Vista, stressing that there is no alternative when additional structures are built without the consent of flat owners and beyond the sanctioned plan.
Supreme Court orders probe into illegal construction at Satkosia Tiger Reserve amid zero buffer zone controversy, raising concerns over wildlife protection, eco-sensitive zones, and tourism-driven projects in Odisha.
The Supreme Court warned that unchecked ecological damage in Himachal Pradesh could wipe the State off the map. It initiated a suo motu PIL and demanded urgent action from the State and Centre.
The Bombay High Court denied ex-AIMIM MLA Farukh Shah’s request to quash an FIR concerning illegal construction and naming of a public square. The court ruled his actions violated legal protocols and misused public funds. Shah faces multiple criminal charges, while the investigation regarding fund misappropriation continues.
The Supreme Court has paused the Madras High Court’s decision to demolish a temple in Madurai that was constructed on reserved land. The petitioners argue they were not allowed the opportunity to respond prior to the court’s ruling, prompting the Supreme Court’s intervention in the matter.
On June 11, Prayagraj Municipal Corporation demolished 151 illegal temporary advocate chambers, leading to protests by lawyers demanding alternative arrangements. The demolition followed prior notices and continued a campaign against encroachments. After escalating tensions and damage to property, talks commenced, with a proposal for permanent accommodations for displaced advocates being discussed.
The Supreme Court of India has ordered a halt to the demolition of Bale Shah Peer Dargah in Uttan, maintaining the status quo. A notice was issued to the Maharashtra government regarding its previous actions. The case will be revisited in four weeks, following concerns over alleged illegal construction in a protected area.
