The Allahabad High Court has rescheduled the hearing in the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute to September 26. The matter, involving claims over the birthplace of Lord Krishna, continues to remain one of the most closely watched legal battles.
The Madras High Court issued a split verdict on animal sacrifices at the Sikkandar Badhusha Dargah. Justice Nisha Banu upheld religious freedoms, while Justice S Srimathy required historical proof for the practice before 1920. The case will now be referred to the Chief Justice for resolution of the differing opinions.
Today, On 28th April,In the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court order allowing the Hindu side to amend their plea, stating, “One thing is clear, amendment must be allowed,” while hearing the appeal filed by the Muslim side against the High Court order allowing the amendment.
Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Vishnu Shankar Jain presented strong arguments in the Bhojshala case at the Supreme Court of India. He supported his claims with solid facts and important documents. His careful approach and legal knowledge helped bring out key points in the case. This hearing is getting a lot of attention because it involves history and religious beliefs.
On Saturday(3rd August), The Varanasi court addressed a plea from Hindu petitioners, seeking to prevent Muslims from walking on the roof of Vyasji’s basement in the Gyanvapi mosque complex. Further hearings are scheduled for August 17, with concerns raised about the fragile condition of the roof and pillars.
The MP High Court today(on 5th April), rejected a man’s plea to participate in ASI’s survey of the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque complex in Dhar, emphasizing the ASI’s independent scientific evaluation. The court emphasized awaiting ASI’s comprehensive findings before making any judgments related to the petitions, highlighting the site’s cultural and religious significance. The survey reflects India’s rich heritage and religious diversity.
The Supreme Court Today (April 1st) declined to halt the Varanasi court’s decision permitting Hindu groups to conduct worship in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi Mosque. CJI Chandrachud led bench, directed both parties to maintain the status quo, allowing both communities to engage in religious prayers. Apex court also sought response of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple trustees on the plea of the mosque management committee.
