The Supreme Court has ruled that a widowed daughter-in-law qualifies as a dependant under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. This recognition allows her to legally seek maintenance from the estate left behind by her deceased father-in-law.
In a partition appeal, Madras High Court ruled that a daughter is entitled to ½ share in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The Court held that the 2012 sale deed is not binding.
The Supreme Court dismissed a long-running inheritance dispute after the only witness to the mother’s will admitted he knew nothing about it, making the will legally invalid. The Court ruled that the property must now devolve under natural Hindu succession, allowing the son to inherit his mother’s share.
The Supreme Court held that mutation requests based on a will must be assessed on their merits under the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. It emphasized, “the application… cannot be rejected merely because it is based on a will.”
The Supreme Court has set aside the Himachal Pradesh High Court’s order, ruling that tribal women in the state cannot inherit property under the Hindu Succession Act, as no formal government notification exempts them from customary tribal laws.
The Supreme Court heard a petition challenging the Hindu Succession Act, which directs a childless widow’s property to her husband’s family. Justice BV Nagarathna highlighted, “under Hindu law, a woman’s gotra changes when she marries.”
Madras High Court delivers a landmark ruling on women’s rights under the Hindu Succession Act, holding that Sreedhana is a woman’s self-acquired property, not inherited from her father.
Boney Kapoor told the Madras High Court that his late wife Sridevi had purchased the ECR farmhouse in 1988, but three individuals are wrongly claiming rights using a “fraudulent” certificate. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has directed the Tahsildar to decide within four weeks.
NEW DELHI: On Tuesday, January 28, 2025, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna made an important statement regarding inheritance laws in India. He said that every person should have the freedom to stop following a religion and choose to be governed by secular inheritance laws. This right should apply to people of all religions equally.
On December 24, 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled in the case of Birbal Saini v. Satywati, clarifying property rights under Hindu law. The court distinguished between ancestral and inherited property, determining that the disputed property was inherited by Bharat Singh and thus self-acquired, allowing its sale without heirs’ consent.
