Wajahat Khan Arrested After Bail Rejection in Kolkata Hate Speech Case

A Kolkata court denied bail to Wajahat Khan, who faced accusations of hate speech against Hindus after filing a complaint against influencer Sharmishta Panoli. Khan, arrested on June 9, had evaded authorities since June 1. Panoli, granted interim bail, is restricted from leaving India pending further legal proceedings.

ANALYSIS| “Arrest Was Mechanical”: Calcutta HC Grants Bail to Sharmistha Panoli, Orders Police Protection Over Social Media Threats

Calcutta High Court granted bail to law student Sharmistha Panoli, calling her arrest “mechanical” and in violation of legal safeguards. The Court also directed police protection citing threats and obscene messages over her social media posts.

BREAKING: Calcutta High Court Grants Interim Bail To Law Student Sharmistha Panoli

Today, On 5th June, Calcutta High Court grants interim bail to law student Sharmistha Panoli, arrested over a video shared during Operation Sindoor. She had moved the court under Article 226 after being denied bail and sent to police custody.

BREAKING UPDATE | Calcutta High Court Stops Law Student Sharmistha Panoli’s Bail Hearing Feed

Today, On 5th June, Calcutta High Court stops live updates of law student Sharmistha Panoli’s bail hearing, raising questions over procedural sensitivity, digital reporting limits, and the judiciary’s control over real-time courtroom transparency.

BREAKING | Sharmistha Panoli Row | “You Would Be Ashamed, This Is About Modesty Of The Young Lady”: Calcutta HC Slams Bengal Police

Today, On 5th June, In the Sharmistha Panoli case, Calcutta High Court told Bengal Police, “You would be ashamed, this is about modesty of the young lady,” questioning her arrest and raising concerns about procedural fairness and dignity.

Wajahat Khan, Complainant in Sharmishta Panoli Case, Accused of Hate Speech, Goes ‘Missing’ After Facing Multiple Cases

Wajahat Khan, who had filed a complaint against influencer Sharmishta Panoli, has now been accused of hate speech. Authorities say he has mysteriously gone missing, raising serious questions and public concern.

Bangladesh Cancels Judges Training Programme  in India Cites Supreme Court Directive: ‘Notification Has Been Cancelled’

Bangladesh has cancelled the judges’ training programme in India, citing a directive from its Supreme Court. The programme was scheduled to begin on February 10 at the National Judicial Academy and State Judicial Academy in Madhya Pradesh. This decision marks a change in judicial training collaboration between the two countries. Further details on the reasons behind the cancellation remain unclear.

VHP Event | “Justice Shekhar Yadav Spoke As A Hindu At VHP Event. Word ‘Kathmulla’ No Hate Speech”: PIL In HC Against Impeachment

A PIL has been filed against the impeachment motion of Justice Shekhar K. Yadav, arguing that his comments at a VHP meeting were misinterpreted and do not constitute hate speech. The petition emphasizes judicial independence and free speech rights, asserting that the allegations do not meet constitutional standards for judicial removal.

“ISKCON is a Religious Fundamentalist Organization”: Bangladesh Govt. to High Court

The Bangladesh government labeled ISKCON a “fundamentalist” group amid rising tensions following the arrest of a Hindu priest, which sparked protests for minority protections. The interim administration faces criticism over its handling of anti-Hindu violence. Diplomatic strains with India increased as it urged protection for Hindu communities, prompting a defensive response from Dhaka.

“Demolition of Dargah in Gir Somnath Done For Removal of Encroachments on Government Land Along Arabian Sea”: Gujarat Govt to Supreme Court

The Gujarat government defended its demolition activities in Gir Somnath before the Supreme Court, asserting the need to remove illegal encroachments on public land. In response to a legal challenge, the government emphasized adherence to legal procedures, while the petitioner accused authorities of targeting Muslim sites unlawfully. The case was adjourned for further review.