• Wed. Feb 4th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: High Court Ruling

    Jana Nayagan Release Row| Blistering Pace: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene
    Jana Nayagan Release Row| Blistering Pace: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene
    Supreme Court

    Jana Nayagan Release Row| Blistering Pace: Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene

    Today, on 15th January 2026, Supreme Court refused to interfere in a producer’s plea over delayed film certification, despite senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi’s submissions. He alleged CBFC acted mala fide, claiming release plans across 5,000 theatres while certification with ten cuts was promised earlier.

    author
    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train
    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train
    HeadlinesSupreme Court

    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train

    Today, On 12th January, The Supreme Court expressed deep dismay over the alleged misconduct of a Madhya Pradesh civil judge during a train journey, including urinating in the compartment. “Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer,” the Court said, condemning the act.

    author
    CBFC Moves Supreme Court Over Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’, Seeks Hearing Before Any Release Order
    CBFC Moves Supreme Court Over Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’, Seeks Hearing Before Any Release Order
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Jana Nayagan Film Row : Makers Move Supreme Court Against Madras HC Stay on U/A Certificate

    The censor clearance dispute over Vijay-starrer Tamil film Jana Nayagan has reached the Supreme Court, as KVN Productions challenged a Madras High Court interim order that created uncertainty over the film’s release. Earlier directions were stayed later by bench.

    author
    If Divorce Proceedings Began During Father’s Lifetime, Then Divorced Daughter Is Entitled To Family Pension: Calcutta High Court
    If Divorce Proceedings Began During Father’s Lifetime, Then Divorced Daughter Is Entitled To Family Pension: Calcutta High Court
    High CourtLatest news

    If Divorce Proceedings Began During Father’s Lifetime, Then Divorced Daughter Is Entitled To Family Pension: Calcutta High Court

    The Calcutta High Court ruled that a divorced daughter may claim family pension if divorce proceedings began during the pensioner’s lifetime, even when the decree came later. A Division Bench dismissed the Union’s plea, upholding the CAT Kolkata decision.

    author
    Immediately Clear Jana Nayagan: Madras High Court Orders CBFC to Approve Vijay Film for Release
    Immediately Clear Jana Nayagan: Madras High Court Orders CBFC to Approve Vijay Film for Release
    High CourtLatest news

    Immediately Clear Jana Nayagan: Madras High Court Orders CBFC to Approve Vijay Film for Release

    The Madras High Court ordered the CBFC to promptly grant final censor clearance for Vijay’s Jana Nayagan, holding that reopening the certification was flawed. Justice P.T. Asha noted filmmakers faced unwarranted delays despite compliance, necessitating judicial intervention by authorities.

    author
    Transfer Orders Under Section 24 CPC Cannot Be Challenged by Special Appeal: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law
    Transfer Orders Under Section 24 CPC Cannot Be Challenged by Special Appeal: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law
    High CourtLatest news

    Transfer Orders Under Section 24 CPC Cannot Be Challenged by Special Appeal: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law

    The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Special Appeal is not maintainable against a Single Judge’s order on transfer applications under Section 24 CPC. Such orders are procedural, not “judgments”, and are barred from appeal under Section 105 of the CPC.

    author
    Shocking Divorce: 23-Year Marriage Ends After Dispute Over Eating Onion and Garlic
    Shocking Divorce: 23-Year Marriage Ends After Dispute Over Eating Onion and Garlic
    High CourtHeadlines

    Shocking Divorce: 23-Year Marriage Ends After Dispute Over Eating Onion and Garlic

    A couple from Gujarat ended their 23-year marriage after a long dispute over eating onion and garlic, leading the High Court to uphold their divorce. Judges agreed the prolonged conflict over dietary choices made the relationship irreparable today.

    author
    Varuna Election Row: Supreme Court Sends Notice to Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah
    Varuna Election Row: Supreme Court Sends Notice to Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Varuna Election Row: Supreme Court Sends Notice to Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah

    Today, On 8th December, A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the election of Congress leader and Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramiah from the Varuna constituency. The plea alleges serious irregularities and seeks judicial scrutiny of his 2023 victory, raising key questions of electoral legality.

    author
    Shocking Negligence: Delhi Court Slams Police in Brutal Rape Case of 4-Year-Old
    Shocking Negligence: Delhi Court Slams Police in Brutal Rape Case of 4-Year-Old
    High CourtLatest news

    Tripura High Court Acquits Man in Rape Case, Says “Solitary Testimony Not Enough Amid Major Contradictions”

    The Tripura High Court overturned a 20-year rape conviction, ruling that the victim’s lone testimony could not stand due to serious inconsistencies and doubtful evidence. The Court held that the prosecution’s case suffered from “fatal infirmities,” making conviction unsafe.

    author
    Rajasthan High Court Clears Appointment of Supreme Court Judge’s Son as AAG, Says Experience Not a Hard Rule
    Rajasthan High Court Clears Appointment of Supreme Court Judge’s Son as AAG, Says Experience Not a Hard Rule
    High CourtLatest news

    Rajasthan High Court Clears Appointment of Supreme Court Judge’s Son as AAG, Says Experience Not a Hard Rule

    The Rajasthan High Court upheld the appointment of Padmesh Mishra, son of a sitting Supreme Court judge, as Additional Advocate General. The Court ruled that advocacy skill is not bound by years of experience and a quo warranto plea cannot challenge such appointments.

    author