The Supreme Court ruled that a High Court cannot replace mandatory injunction decrees with monetary compensation when such relief was not sought. A Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and Atul S. Chandurkar set aside the Punjab and Haryana HC order.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Centre’s decision to temporarily ban Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examinations. Justice Tejas Karia held that the government’s measures were the least restrictive and could not be considered disproportionate to the objective sought.
The Delhi High Court on Thursday reserved its order on Telegram’s plea challenging the government’s temporary ban on the messaging platform ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination. Justice Tejas Karia questioned the restriction, asking how rights of millions could be affected.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a divorced woman can continue recovering maintenance granted through a decree from her deceased former husband’s estate. However, she cannot seek enhancement of maintenance after his death, as personal obligations end upon the obligor’s demise.
The Madras High Court ruled that trial judges must actively participate in proceedings and not remain passive observers. Justices GR Swaminathan and R Poornima restored a money recovery suit, holding that courts must seek clarifications and ensure fair trial principles through judicial engagement.
The Calcutta High Court reserved its order on a plea challenging the appointment of rebel TMC MLA Ritabrata Banerjee as Leader of Opposition, questioning the Speaker’s authority to ignore the party’s recommendation of Sobhandeb Chattopadhyay.
The Madras High Court dismissed petitions seeking scrutiny of alleged discrepancies in election affidavits filed by TVK leader Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin, and Tamilisai Soundararajan during Tamil Nadu Assembly elections 2026.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the appointment of DK Shivakumar as Deputy Chief Minister and the swearing-in of the State Cabinet, calling it “frivolous” and “a publicity stunt.” The Court also imposed a Rs.50,000 cost on the petitioner for wasting judicial time.
The Bombay High Court was informed that security has been extended to retired Judge Gautam Patel and his family after alleged threats linked to his Dawoodi Bohra succession judgment. The Court stressed swift action, saying protection was crucial as police investigated the complaint and threat letters.
The Supreme Court stayed a Rajasthan High Court order allowing parents of an inter-caste married woman to meet her, after the couple expressed fears of honour killing and threats from her family following their marriage.
