Why Have You Come Here? Go To Your Parents, No Place Here For Those Who Don’t Respect Parents: Uttarakhand HC’s Sharp Remark To Runaway Couple

The Uttarakhand High Court reprimanded a runaway couple who married against family wishes but directed police protection. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal heard the case involving an 18-year-old woman and 21-year-old man facing threats from her relatives.

“The continued detention would not serve the ends of justice”: Delhi High Court grants bail after Four Years Custody in UAPA Case

The Delhi High Court granted bail to two accused booked under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, noting prolonged custody exceeding four years and absence of timely trial, despite allegations of promoting Islamic State ideology.

Movie Kerala Story 2 Row| Petitions Are Premature, Misconceived : Producer Vipul Shah Tells Kerala HC

Producer Vipul Amrutlal Shah told the Kerala High Court that pleas against “The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond” are premature and not maintainable, asserting Central Board of Film Certification alone can certify films under the Cinematograph Act, 1952.

Caste Assigned at Birth Remains Unchanged Even After Conversion or Marriage: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court held caste by birth remains unchanged despite conversion or marriage, while dismissing an appeal against summons under the SC/ST Act from an Aligarh special court. Justice Anil Kumar-X ruled religion may change, but caste endures.

‘No Urgency’ in Death Penalty Plea: Delhi High Court to Hear NIA vs Yasin Malik Case on April 22

The Delhi High Court has listed April 22, 2026, to hear the National Investigation Agency’s appeal seeking death penalty for Yasin Malik. The court granted four weeks to the NIA to file its response, observing that there was “no urgency” as Malik is already serving a life sentence.

“Where is the misconduct?” Punjab & Haryana High Court slams Bar Association for action against PIL lawyer

The Punjab and Haryana High Court stopped the Bar Association from taking action against Advocate Prithvi Raj Yadav for filing a PIL on encroachments. The Bench said disciplinary proceedings “virtually amount to interference in justice.”