Extradition For 26/11 Mumbai Attack Accused || Tahawwur Rana Removed as US Supreme Court Rejects Petition

The US Supreme Court denied the petition filed by Tahawwur Rana, accused of involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, clearing the final obstacle for his extradition to India. Currently detained in Los Angeles, Rana is wanted by Indian authorities to face prosecution for his alleged role in the attacks. The decision marks a significant step toward justice for the victims of the 2008 tragedy. Authorities are now working on the next steps for his extradition.

Bengaluru Techie Atul Subhash Suicide Case: Supreme Court Hearing on Grandson’s Custody On Jan 20

The Supreme Court will revisit the custody plea of Anju Devi for her grandson following the death of her son, Atul Subhash. Despite a previous denial, the court has directed the child be presented on January 20. Concerns arise over the boy’s welfare amid allegations against his mother, Nikita Singhania.

BREAKING| Atul Subhash Suicide Row: Bengaluru Court Grants Bail to Wife Nikita Singhania, In-Laws In Abetment Of Suicide Case

Today, On 4th December, Atul Subhash, a Bengaluru techie, tragically died by suicide, leading to an abetment case against his wife, Nikita Singhania, her mother, Nisha Singhania, and brother, Anurag Singhania. The trio approached a sessions court in Bengaluru and were granted bail. The case involves allegations linked to Subhash’s death. Further investigation and legal proceedings are underway.

Gujarat High Court Rejects Husband’s Plea to Return His Pregnant Wife from ‘Lesbian’ Friend, Cites ‘It’s Her Choice’

The Gujarat High Court dismissed a husband’s plea to return his pregnant wife from her friend, respecting her choice to remain with her. The court found no illegal confinement, as the woman reported mental and physical harassment by her husband, leading to her decision to leave and seek freedom.

Andhra Pradesh High Court: “Societal Pressures Can’t Stop Adult Woman from Living with Same-Sex Partner

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that a family cannot stop an adult woman from living with a same-sex partner. The decision came after a woman claimed her partner was forcibly held by her family. The court stressed the importance of individual freedom and the right to choose one’s partner, regardless of gender. This ruling reflects growing support for LGBTQ+ rights in India.

High Court Upholds Lesbian Couple’s Right To Live Together, Parents Told Not To ‘Interfere’

The Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the right of a lesbian couple to live together, addressing a habeas corpus petition concerning one partner’s detainment by her father. The court emphasized that adults can make personal choices regarding relationships and ordered the parents not to interfere, affirming the couple’s right to their relationship.

Isha Foundation Sues for Defamation Over Nakkheeran Videos; Seeks Rs 3 Crore Damages

Isha Foundation has filed a defamation suit against Nakkheeran for publishing critical allegations against it. Seeking Rs 3 crore in damages, the case, scheduled to begin arguments in April 2025, involves claims of misconduct. The Supreme Court previously ruled that two women at the ashram are there voluntarily, prompting ongoing investigations.

“Special Circumstances & Mutual Consent to Separate”: Madras HC Annuls 20-Year-Old’s Marriage with Teacher

The Madras High Court annulled a 20-year-old woman’s marriage to her former teacher, citing coercion and lack of understanding during the signing of marriage papers. The court voided the registration, emphasizing the importance of consent and personal autonomy. The teacher agreed to end the marriage, allowing the woman to pursue her education.

Samsung Workers’ Protest|| “Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissed”: Madras HC

Yesterday, On 9th October, the Madras High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition concerning the arrest of eight Samsung workers during a protest. The court found the petition unnecessary as the arrested individuals had been released by a magistrate. While this case’s legal issue was resolved, broader social and labor concerns remain unaddressed.

[POCSO Cases] “Police Should Go After Persons Leaking Sensitive Information, Not Journalists”: HC

The High Court criticized police actions in POCSO Act cases, emphasizing that they should target those leaking sensitive information instead of journalists. The court highlighted the importance of press freedom and mandated investigations to uncover real offenders. It also noted police misconduct toward a minor victim and ordered protection measures and a CBI investigation.