Supreme Court of India criticised the Haryana Police for its shameful handling of a three-year-old’s rape in Gurugram and formed an SIT of women IPS officers for an impartial probe. Stating the police must visit the victim’s house.
Today, On 23rd March, The Supreme Court of India issued notices to the Haryana government and its DGP on a plea seeking a CBI or SIT probe into a Gurugram minor’s rape, calling police conduct “shocking” and questioning their basic legal understanding.
The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order directing a CBI probe into the Ambience Island project in Gurugram. The ruling brings major relief to residents and stakeholders, while clarifying that other connected cases before the High Court will continue independently.
The Supreme Court will hear lawyer Vikram Singh’s plea on Wednesday challenging his arrest by Haryana’s Special Task Force in a murder case. Singh claims he was targeted for representing a co-accused as part of his professional duty.
On Supreme Court’s orders, CBI registered 22 FIRs and raided 47 NCR sites in a builder–bank scam. Homebuyers were lured with false promises of “No Pre-EMI till possession”, leaving them cheated and trapped in loans.
Supreme Court allows CBI to register 22 FIRs over alleged fraud by builders and banks under subvention schemes in NCR. The bench termed it an “unholy nexus” causing massive loss to over 1,200 homebuyers.
A female advocate from Tis Hazari Bar has moved the Supreme Court alleging sexual assault, physical abuse, and illegal detention by Gurugram police while assisting a client in a matrimonial case at Sector 50 police station.
A 24-year-old trainee air hostess has accused a hospital staff member of sexually assaulting her while she was in a semi-conscious state in the ICU of Medanta Hospital, Gurugram.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered the Haryana government to take strict action against nearly 4,000 illegal constructions in DLF City, Gurugram, within two months. The court slammed authorities for allowing unplanned development, warning that it could collapse Gurugram’s infrastructure, water supply, transport, and air quality. It also directed civil courts to close unauthorized cases blocking action. The ruling came in response to petitions highlighting violations of zoning laws and building codes, exposing a land mafia nexus.
A heated argument between a government lawyer and an advocate at a Gurugram court led to tensions between the Bar Association and the presiding judge. The judge criticized the behavior of the advocate and Bar members, prompting the Bar to file a complaint with the Punjab and Haryana High Court and boycott the court for two weeks. The dispute escalated during witness testimony, resulting in offensive language and a temporary suspension of the hearing. The Gurgaon District Bar Association passed a resolution condemning the incident and the JMIC’s reluctance to resolve the matter.
