The Supreme Court declined to hear a plea alleging custodial torture and sexual assault of a 17-year-old in Gujarat, asking the petitioner to first seek remedies before the High Court. The plea had sought an SIT or CBI probe, AIIMS medical report, and compensation.
Today, On 28th March, The Supreme Court ruled that the notion of art or stand-up comedy inciting hatred could severely restrict free speech. The court emphasized that literature, poetry, drama, films, satire, and stage performances enrich human life. It highlighted the importance of artistic expression in a democratic society. The verdict reinforces the constitutional protection of creative freedom in India.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday (28th March) criticized the Gujarat Police for filing a First Information Report (FIR) against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi over a poem he had posted on social media. The Court ruled in his favor, stating that freedom of speech and expression is more important than the restrictions that can be imposed on it under the law.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on 3rd March, heard a case against Congress MP and poet Imran Pratapgarhi, who is facing police action for sharing a song on social media. The case, which sparked legal and literary discussions, also had moments of humor between Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate Kapil Sibal.
Today, On 3rd March, The Supreme Court criticized Gujarat Police for registering an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi over a social media post featuring a poem. The court stressed the significance of free speech, stating that the poem promotes non-violence and does not target any religion. It suggested that the case may have political motives and granted interim protection to Pratapgarhi.
NEW DELHI: On February 10, the Supreme Court raised concerns regarding an FIR filed against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi by the Gujarat Police. The FIR was registered after Pratapgarhi allegedly posted an edited video of a provocative song. The Supreme Court bench, led by Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, questioned the reasoning behind the Gujarat High Court’s dismissal of Pratapgarhi’s plea to quash the FIR.
![[Breaking] NEET-UG Scam| CBI Apprehends Main Conspirator Jharkhand's Dhanbad](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-37-1.png?resize=297%2C170&ssl=1)
Today, On 3rd July, The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has made multiple arrests related to the NEET-UG paper leak scandal, including the main conspirator from Dhanbad, Jharkhand. The suspects are accused of tampering with the exam process to guarantee improved scores for candidates. The National Testing Agency (NTA) is under scrutiny, with nationwide protests calling for its disbandment.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed a PIL by Daman Liquor Merchants Association seeking to halt Gujarat police action against its members under prohibition laws, ruling it as misconceived. The court affirmed the legality of the police action within their jurisdiction, stating the petitioners should seek remedies through legal process rather than court interference.
The association’s PIL calls for the Gujarat High Court to issue directives to the Gujarat Police, restraining them from initiating criminal actions against wine shop owners and liquor license holders in Maharashtra based on the testimonies of individuals apprehended for prohibition law violations in Gujarat. shop owners from Maharashtra have approached the Gujarat High Court […]
The Supreme Court expressed strong disapproval of the Gujarat police and a magistrate for remanding an accused despite anticipatory bail. Justices sought Gujarat government and police response and impleaded the Gujarat High Court. The incident highlights the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and judicial accountability, emphasizing the role of higher judicial academies in training legal professionals.