Deepfake Misuse: Gujarat High Court Issues Notices to Tech Giants, Seeks Stronger AI Regulation And Content Removal Framework

The Gujarat High Court issued notices to Meta India Google X Reddit and Scribd over deepfake misuse concerns. Bench led by Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal directed intermediaries to join Sahyog portal and ensure timely removal of unlawful AI content

“Missing 30 Hearings, Shall I Change the Premises of the High Court for You?”: Gujarat HC Blasts Lawyer

The Gujarat High Court Today (Aug 12) criticised a lawyer for not attending a single hearing in a pension case since 2024, leading to 30 adjournments. Justice Nikhil S Kariel questioned why such conduct should not be reported to the Bar Council.

Rape Case Against 11-Year-Old Boy | “Filing FIR Was in Defiance of Law”: Gujarat HC Quashes 14-Year-Old Case, Cites Section 83 IPC

Gujarat High Court cancels a 2010 rape FIR filed against a minor boy aged 10 and a half. The Court said the police ignored key IPC law meant to protect children from criminal liability.

Senior Advocate Asim Pandya Demands General Meeting Over Gujarat High Court Roster Changes

Senior Advocate Asim Pandya has called for a GHCAA meeting to address concerns over recent roster changes at the Gujarat High Court, questioning their impact on judicial independence and rule of law.

CRPF Denies Woman Promotion Due to HIV-AIDS, Gujarat HC Calls It “Clear Discrimination”

The Gujarat High Court slammed the CRPF for denying a female staff member a promotion solely because she has HIV-AIDS, calling it a clear case of discrimination. The court has sought the presence of the Additional Solicitor General in the next hearing on March 6. The woman has challenged CRPF rules that violate the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017 and constitutional rights. The court’s final decision will determine whether these rules stand or change to protect the rights of employees with HIV-AIDS.

Gujarat High Court Chief Justice and GHCAA President Resolve Dispute After Heated Exchange

The Gujarat High Court resolved a conflict between Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and GHCAA President Brijesh J Trivedi that arose during a January 17 courtroom incident. After mutual expressions of regret, they emphasized the need for respect within judicial proceedings, allowing the court to move forward and focus on its responsibilities while addressing the importance of maintaining harmony.

GNLU Registrar Apologizes to Gujarat HC Over Rape, Harassment Allegations

Today, On 1st May, GNLU’s Registrar apologized for downplaying rape and harassment allegations at the university, following widespread criticism and court intervention. The Gujarat High Court acknowledged the apology and made recommendations for improving the Internal Complaints Committee. They emphasized the need for male representation in the committee and proposed the establishment of a complaint box managed by an independent secretariat.

CJI Orders Gujarat HC Registry Response on Promotion of Judicial Officers to AD SJs

Today, 26th April, The Supreme Court instructed the Gujarat High Court Registry to provide a response regarding the promotion of judicial officers to Additional District Judges. This directive follows a legal petition seeking clarity and transparency in the promotion process. The case highlights the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal guidelines in judicial appointments. The Supreme Court’s involvement highlights its role in upholding the integrity of the judiciary.

 “Thank God! The Gujarat HC Intervened. It is a Scam”: SC Trashes Plea of Surat APMC

 “Thank God! The Gujarat High Court intervened. It is a scam,” the CJI led bench observed Yesterday (April 19th) while dismissing an appeal of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Surat against a high court order for auctioning a five star hotel constructed on the land meant for a market yard.

Gujarat HC Dismisses Compensation Challenges in Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Today, 8th April,The Gujarat HC dismissed pleas by two Sabarmati Ashram residents challenging compensation in the redevelopment project, citing lack of evidence for a hidden fourth option. The residents initially chose cash compensation but failed to vacate on time and then sought a halt to demolition. The court upheld their initial choice.