The Bombay High Court quashed the seizure of Rs 1 crore by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, ruling GST officers lack authority to confiscate cash found during searches. The court granted relief to Mumbai trader Smruti Waghdhare.
The Allahabad High Court held that the Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act lacks power to remand matters, annulling refund-related remand orders and relying on its earlier ruling in Anand & Anand vs. Principal Commissioner of CGST prohibiting such action.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld orders involving Kudos Facility Services, saying DIN absence does not invalidate electronically issued documents reference numbers. Justices Rao Raghunandan Rao and T. C. D. Sekhar held digital validity and compliance were adequately proven.
The Gujarat High Court ruled that delays in filing GST appeals cannot be condoned beyond the statutory time limit, even under Article 226 writ jurisdiction. Justices A.S. Supehia and Pranav Trivedi dismissed the petition, citing excessive and impermissible delay.
The Supreme Court ruled that summons under Section 70 of the CGST Act do not amount to initiation of proceedings under Section 6(2)(b), allowing parallel investigations by Central and State GST authorities. It also issued a detailed nine-point framework to prevent duplication and ensure smooth enforcement.
