A Controlling Authority Under The Gratuity Act Can Only Compute The Amount Payable, Not Decide On Whom The Liability Falls: Supreme Court Sets Aside ONGC’s Gratuity Liability

The Supreme Court has held that a Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 has jurisdiction only to compute the amount of gratuity payable to an ’employee’, and not to decide the question of liability or fasten it on a party. Setting aside a Bombay High Court order that had made ONGC liable to pay gratuity to workers engaged through contractors, the Court held there was no employer-employee relationship, but directed that no recovery be made from the workers as the amounts had already been paid.

Stepson Is Not Eligible to Receive Family Pension Under Railway Services (Pension) Rules: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court ruled that a stepson is not entitled to family pension under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. The Court held that family pension is a statutory benefit available only to persons falling within the Rules’ definition of “family,” unlike gratuity nominations.

Employee Rights | Pension, Gratuity Cannot Be Withheld for Not Vacating Govt Housing: Supreme Court

Supreme Court affirms employee rights, ruling that pension and gratuity cannot be withheld for not vacating government housing. Landmark judgment ensures timely retiral benefits for all employees.

CJI Gavai Praises Justice Oka for Granting Gratuity to Anganwadi Workers: “His Judgments Were About Understanding Lives”

CJI Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai praised Justice Abhay Oka for ensuring gratuity to Anganwadi workers, saying, “His judgments were about understanding lives, resolving real problems, and making justice accessible to everyone,” reflecting his deep commitment to social justice.