Today, On 27th November, The Centre has filed a curative plea in the Supreme Court challenging the 9-judge ruling that upheld States’ authority to tax minerals. This move revives a major federal dispute over mineral royalty, pricing, and constitutional powers.
Today, On 28th February, The Delhi Government informed the Supreme Court that it is proceeding with the implementation of the Ayushman Bharat scheme and sought to withdraw its Special Leave Petition (SLP). The scheme aims to strengthen healthcare infrastructure and improve access to medical services. The decision aligns with the Pradhan Mantri – Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (PM-ABHIM) to enhance public health facilities.
Today, On 8th January, The Delhi High Court rejected a plea seeking a rehabilitation package under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The petition argued for financial support for communities impacted by the law, but the court ruled against granting such a package. The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal discourse surrounding the CAA.
Today, On 16th December, the Supreme Court granted a five-year extension for the registration of three specialized armored diesel vehicles used by the Special Protection Group for the Prime Minister’s security, countering a National Green Tribunal order that denied it due to age restrictions. The ruling highlights the vehicles’ crucial role in ensuring safety.
![[Lawyers Ads Controversy] Sulekha Moves Supreme Court Against Madras High Court Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Image-1-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court upheld the premature retirement of Uttar Pradesh judge Shobh Nath Singh due to a poor service record, emphasizing the high ethical standards required for judicial officers. The Court dismissed Singh’s appeal, reinforcing that judges must demonstrate integrity and accountability, reflecting the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining rigorous conduct.
Today, On 5th November, The Supreme Court ruled that not all private properties qualify as community resources under Article 39(b) for State acquisition. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud led the majority opinion, stating that properties must meet specific criteria. The court’s decision reflects differing judicial views on property rights and State authority, with three judgments delivered in total.
Today, On 13th July, The Supreme Court questioned the retroactive application of Section 479 of the BNSS, allowing bail for first-time undertrials. This provision, addressing prison overcrowding, provides a more lenient option for release after serving one-third of the maximum sentence. The Court instructed the Central government to clarify this and emphasized the urgency of addressing prison conditions nationwide.
Dismisses Undertrial Visitation Rights Petition In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has called for a response from the Delhi High Court concerning a petition filed by a judicial officer. This petition is particularly notable as it seeks to expunge adverse remarks made against the officer. The origins of this plea trace […]
