Selective and Plainly Arbitrary: Court Slams CBI’s Use of ‘South Group’ Label for Excise Policy Accused

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation for tagging some accused in the Delhi excise policy case as the ‘South Group’ while avoiding any corresponding ‘North Group’ label for others. Calling it plainly arbitrary and unwarranted.

Pre-Meditated and Choreographed: Delhi Court Slams CBI, Orders Action Against Officer In Excise Policy Case

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court ordered action against a Central Bureau of Investigation officer in the excise policy case, saying departmental proceedings are needed to ensure accountability. The judge termed the investigation “pre-meditated and choreographed,” asserting the allegations were tailored to support a narrative.

Excise Policy Case| No Overarching Conspiracy: Court Closes CBI Case Against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court dismissed all charges against 23 individuals in the excise policy case, including Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and K Kavitha. The Court ruled, “There was no overarching conspiracy or criminal intent in the excise policy.”

BREAKING| Bengal SIR| Class 10 Admit Cards Can Be Used as ID When Accompanied by Pass Certificates: Supreme Court

Today, On 25th February, The Supreme Court clarified that during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal, Madhyamik admit cards may serve as supporting identity documents. However, they will be accepted only when accompanied by the relevant pass certificates for verification.

Violation Of Fundamental Rights: Advocate Moves HC Against Maharashtra Govt’s Cancellation Of 5% Muslim Quota

Advocate has moved the High Court challenging the Maharashtra government’s cancellation of the 5% Muslim quota, calling the decision unjustified. The plea alleges state is practicing racial discrimination against the Muslim community, violating fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India.

Policy Circulars Are Binding On Government Even If Executive In Nature: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that government policy decisions issued through circulars are binding and cannot be ignored without lawful amendment or justification. Any action taken in violation of such policy is arbitrary and breaches Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Royalty Over Minerals: Centre Files Curative Plea In Supreme Court Against 9-Judge Ruling Upholding States’ Power to Tax Minerals

Today, On 27th November, The Centre has filed a curative plea in the Supreme Court challenging the 9-judge ruling that upheld States’ authority to tax minerals. This move revives a major federal dispute over mineral royalty, pricing, and constitutional powers.

GST 2025 Big Update: What Are Sin Goods and Why They Face Highest Tax | 40% Slab on Luxury Products Explained

The government has introduced a new 40% GST slab, the highest ever, aimed at “sin goods” and select luxury items. This GST 2025 update explains which products are affected and why they now face the steepest tax rate.

Calcutta High Court Stays New OBC List, WB Govt Moves Supreme Court Challenging HC’S Order

The Calcutta High Court has put an interim stay on West Bengal’s new OBC list, which includes 140 sub-categories. Challenging this order, the Mamata Banerjee-led state government has approached the Supreme Court. Next hearing is on July 31.

PM-ABHIM Scheme | “We Are Moving Forward With Implementation”: Delhi Govt to SC on Ayushman Bharat

Today, On 28th February, The Delhi Government informed the Supreme Court that it is proceeding with the implementation of the Ayushman Bharat scheme and sought to withdraw its Special Leave Petition (SLP). The scheme aims to strengthen healthcare infrastructure and improve access to medical services. The decision aligns with the Pradhan Mantri – Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (PM-ABHIM) to enhance public health facilities.