The Supreme Court ruled that the Biometric Attendance System in government offices is valid and beneficial, stating that lack of employee consultation doesn’t make it illegal. The Court set aside the Orissa High Court’s 2014 order and allowed its full implementation.
West Bengal has requested a six-month extension from the Supreme Court to pay 25% of the pending Dearness Allowance (DA) to employees, citing a financial crisis. The state offered to deposit the dues directly with the court amid threats of contempt from employee unions. A prior deadline has expired, and the case will be revisited in August.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that Madhya Pradesh can raise the retirement age of judicial officers to 61 if allowed by current rules and agreed upon by the High Court. This directive follows a petition from the Madhya Pradesh Judges Association, seeking parity with other government employees whose retirement age is 62.
A long legal fight between a husband and wife, both judges, ended with the Punjab and Haryana High Court reinstating the husband back to work after 16 years. The had accused him of misconduct, which led to his dismissal and their marriage being annulled in 2012. However, the court found that there was not enough proof to justify his removal, highlighting the importance of following proper legal procedures. This decision shows the need for fairness and justice in the judiciary, even in cases involving personal issues.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court criticized the 50-year ban on government employees joining the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), calling it a mistake. The ban, lifted recently, had curtailed employees’ aspirations. The court questioned the basis for the ban and directed departments to inform employees of the decision.
