The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment on a plea by the Gautam Gambhir Foundation seeking to quash a criminal case over alleged illegal stocking and distribution of COVID-19 medicines during the second wave. The case has attracted attention due to Gambhir’s role as a former BJP MP and relief efforts.
The Delhi High Court reserved its order on the maintainability of the Popular Front of India’s petition, where the organisation has challenged the Centre’s decision imposing a five-year ban under the anti-terror law.
The Popular Front of India (PFI) has filed a petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering proceedings. The Delhi High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the case for November 17, 2025.
Today, On 25th August, In the Covid drugs case, the Delhi High Court refused to stay trial court proceedings against Gautam Gambhir, observing that “once you get a stay, you stop appearing, the investigation stops, nothing survives and the whole goes away.”
Today, On 18th November, the Delhi High Court provided relief to Gautam Gambhir in a cheating case related to a housing project. Gambhir challenged a sessions court’s reversal of a trial court discharge decision. Allegations involve irregularities in the ‘Serra Bella’ project, promoted by companies he was associated with, causing financial losses for homebuyers.
A Delhi court has set aside a prior ruling that dismissed a cheating case against Gautam Gambhir, instructing the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate potential money laundering activities. The court found the previous discharge order inadequate, highlighting Gambhir’s financial dealings related to a real estate project and the need for further scrutiny.
The Delhi High Court has referred Gautam Gambhir’s defamation lawsuit against Punjab Kesari and its journalists to mediation, signaling a potential for amicable settlement. The lawsuit arose from allegedly defamatory articles published by the newspaper, prompting Gambhir to seek restraints, an apology, and damages. The move towards mediation signifies the judiciary’s role in resolving such disputes.
