Branding An Individual As Terrorist Associate Amounts To Defamation: Jammu and Kashmir High Court

The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh ruled that falsely portraying a person as having terrorist ties inherently harms their reputation. Such misrepresentation, the Court clarified, clearly meets the legal threshold for criminal defamation under law.

No Sanction To Prosecute Prof. Mahmudabad As One-Time Magnanimity Over Operation Sindoor FB Post : Haryana Tells Supreme Court

Today, On 16th March, The Haryana government informed the Supreme Court of India that it would, as a one-time act of “magnanimity”, refuse sanction to prosecute Ali Khan Mahmudabad. The case concerns social-media comments on Operation Sindoor made.

Tirumala Laddu Controversy: Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Plea Seeking Action Over Alleged Spreading Misinformation

Today, On 13th March, The Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a petition seeking action against individuals and groups accused of spreading misinformation through posters and public statements regarding the Tirumala laddu controversy, stating that such issues require appropriate remedies elsewhere.

Big Relief For Rahul Gandhi: Nashik Court Closes Defamation Case Over Vinayak Savarkar Remark

A Nashik criminal court has dismissed the defamation case lodged against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for comments he made about Hindutva figure Vinayak Damodar Savarkar during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. The court’s decision formally ends the proceedings.

BREAKING| Terror Funding Case: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Separatist Leader Shabir Ahmed Shah

Today, On 12th March, The Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Shabir Ahmed Shah, leader of the Jammu Kashmir Democratic Freedom Party, in a terror-funding case. He faces UAPA charges for allegedly conspiring to separate Jammu and Kashmir from India and country.

Selective and Plainly Arbitrary: Court Slams CBI’s Use of ‘South Group’ Label for Excise Policy Accused

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation for tagging some accused in the Delhi excise policy case as the ‘South Group’ while avoiding any corresponding ‘North Group’ label for others. Calling it plainly arbitrary and unwarranted.

Pre-Meditated and Choreographed: Delhi Court Slams CBI, Orders Action Against Officer In Excise Policy Case

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court ordered action against a Central Bureau of Investigation officer in the excise policy case, saying departmental proceedings are needed to ensure accountability. The judge termed the investigation “pre-meditated and choreographed,” asserting the allegations were tailored to support a narrative.

Such Remarks Go Beyond Fair Criticism And May Invite Contempt : Allahabad High Court Over Abusive Social Media Posts On Judiciary

The Allahabad High Court has cautioned social media users against posting abusive comments targeting the judiciary. It stressed that such remarks exceed fair criticism and may lead to serious consequences under contempt law for those who make them.

Excise Policy Case| No Overarching Conspiracy: Court Closes CBI Case Against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia

Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court dismissed all charges against 23 individuals in the excise policy case, including Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and K Kavitha. The Court ruled, “There was no overarching conspiracy or criminal intent in the excise policy.”

Don’t Upload Any Objectionable Post on Social Media: Allahabad HC Grants Bail To Man Over ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ Post

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a man arrested last May for allegedly posting “Pakistan Zindabad” on Instagram after the Pahalgam attack. The court ordered, “The applicant will not upload any objectionable post on social media which is against the reputation of the country or against any community.” The Allahabad High Court granted bail […]