The Punjab government has challenged the Governor’s decision to send a reference to the President under Article 200, while the Union government has sought the Supreme Court’s nod to refer the matter to a five-judge constitutional bench.
The Delhi High Court set aside earlier guidelines issued to trial courts regarding victim compensation. It ruled that requiring the accused or convict to submit an affidavit disclosing their assets and liabilities violates constitutional and statutory rights. The judgment emphasizes the need to balance victims’ rights with the legal protections afforded to the accused. This decision could impact the approach trial courts take in compensation-related matters.
The Supreme Court today (25th Sept) cautioned judges and lawyers against personal biases impacting their duties after controversial remarks by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda. The court emphasized national integrity, urging mindfulness due to social media’s expansive reach. While closing proceedings after an apology, it reiterated the need for impartiality in justice.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI Chandrachud, today reserved judgment on whether an ineligible person can nominate an arbitrator. Solicitor General Mehta emphasized strengthening arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. The Court discussed significant questions of law and the challenges in the arbitrator selection process, with a focus on party autonomy and potential injustice.
![[BREAKING] Same Sex Marriage | Justice Sanjeev Khanna Recused Himself from the Hearing Citing Personal Reasons](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-33-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will review 13 petitions challenging the 2023 verdict on same-sex marriage in India. A specially constituted five-judge bench, including Chief Justice Chandrachud, will consider the petitions. The review aims for a more inclusive interpretation of marriage laws to encompass same-sex couples. Justices Khanna and Nagarathna have replaced retired Justices Kaul and Bhat.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, has decided to refer the issue of automatic vacation of stay orders after six months to a larger five-judge bench. This decision comes in light of concerns that automatic vacation of stay orders could lead to serious miscarriages of justice in certain cases. Also […]
